“…Similarly, for the EAs, ontologies and taxonomies have been defined for specific domains in XP [20], FDD [27], Scrum [28,29], and the generic ontology for agile methods presented in [30]. At the analysis level of the structure of the concepts related to the agility, some defined taxonomies have been found, which have allowed to identify the dependencies between agile software development projects and to facilitate the coordination and collaboration among projects [31] and also, solutions that have allowed analyzing the agile behavior of project managers [32]. However, it has been possible to observe that the proposed solutions are of a preliminary nature and are limited in the following aspects: i) a generic scope that supports multiple AAs and TAs is not included, ii) absence of concepts and fundamental agile relationships such as: values , principles, agile practices and activities of the process, iii) the relationship of the proposed concepts, the concept of quality, the agile principles and values are not observed, iv) there are still inconsistencies and conflicts related to terminology, and vii) the potential and benefits of the harmonization between the concepts and relationships present in AAs and TAs is not maximized.…”