2006
DOI: 10.1504/ijasm.2006.010946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agility, knowledge management, and organisational learning: synergies and inter-relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conceptual reviews and proposals have been built on the strong synergy of KM in relation to agility (Ashrafi et al., 2005; Dove, 1999; Gligor, 2014; Jamali & Keshishian, 2006). In prior empirical studies of single factors, such as the KM study by Zack et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conceptual reviews and proposals have been built on the strong synergy of KM in relation to agility (Ashrafi et al., 2005; Dove, 1999; Gligor, 2014; Jamali & Keshishian, 2006). In prior empirical studies of single factors, such as the KM study by Zack et al.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…H4 Soft TQM is positively related to agility Conceptual reviews and proposals have been built on the strong synergy of KM in relation to agility (Ashrafi et al, 2005;Dove, 1999;Gligor, 2014;Jamali & Keshishian, 2006). In prior empirical studies of single factors, such as the KM study by Zack et al (2009), it was implied that KM is likely related to additional organizational factors, such as agility in relation to firm performance.…”
Section: Agilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational literature is giving increasing precedence to knowledge and structural conditions that can influence its flow (Alinasab et al , 2022; Caputo, 2021). Jamali et al (2006) identify knowledge as a cornerstone for agility. The ability to adapt, adjust and respond is derived from how successfully knowledge is used in an organization system.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[42] It is important to note that multi-stakeholder partnerships are not devoid of challenges. [43] As discussed, although child labour cannot be effectively addressed solely through corporate selfregulation and solo efforts of stakeholders, thus indicating the need for collaborative approaches, the failure of pluralist models can still result in activism by CSOs and paternalist attitudes by companies. [44] Furthermore, Preuss, Haunschild and Matten argue that companies strive to keep a irst-mover advantage in developing CSR agendas and strategies, and want to have the ability to exclude stakeholders from doing so, while CSOs want to actively shape the CSR agenda and strategies of companies and avoid losing in luence over this process.…”
Section: B the Rise Of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives In Global Supply...mentioning
confidence: 99%