2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging alters interspecific competition between two sympatric insect–parasitic nematode species

Abstract: Interspecific competition can vary depending on the stage, age, or physiological state of the competitors. Competitive ability often increases with age or size; alternatively, senescence can lead to a loss of viability and reduced competitive success. Differences between species in their age‐specific competitive abilities can promote coexistence in the face of substantial niche overlap.We examined two sympatric species of nematodes (genus Steinernema) to determine whether their competitive relationship changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, coinfection of insect hosts by more than one species of Steinernema nematodes likely occurs in nature as species overlap spatially in the soil and in host range (Spiridonov et al, 2007;Půža and Mracek, 2009). In most cases where coinfection between two Steinernema species has been experimentally observed, one species is competitively dominant, often fully suppressing reproduction of the other species (Kondo and Ishibashi, 1986;Koppenhofer and Kaya, 1996;Sicard et al, 2006;Bashey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, coinfection of insect hosts by more than one species of Steinernema nematodes likely occurs in nature as species overlap spatially in the soil and in host range (Spiridonov et al, 2007;Půža and Mracek, 2009). In most cases where coinfection between two Steinernema species has been experimentally observed, one species is competitively dominant, often fully suppressing reproduction of the other species (Kondo and Ishibashi, 1986;Koppenhofer and Kaya, 1996;Sicard et al, 2006;Bashey et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%