2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and performance on an everyday-based visual search task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the TBI participants may have experienced difficulty detecting or selecting the absence of a target, or they may have set a higher criterion than controls for saying that the target was not there. Similar difficulties with target-absent responses have also been noted in the aging population (Hommell, Li, & Li, 2004; Potter et al, 2012), and the underlying nature of this finding requires further investigation. This finding, combined with the consistent finding of a slower visual search process in the attentive search condition that did not improve with time in contrast to overall RT, suggests that the TBI participants were experiencing difficulties with specific aspects of the visual search process rather than experiencing a general reduction in processing speed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the TBI participants may have experienced difficulty detecting or selecting the absence of a target, or they may have set a higher criterion than controls for saying that the target was not there. Similar difficulties with target-absent responses have also been noted in the aging population (Hommell, Li, & Li, 2004; Potter et al, 2012), and the underlying nature of this finding requires further investigation. This finding, combined with the consistent finding of a slower visual search process in the attentive search condition that did not improve with time in contrast to overall RT, suggests that the TBI participants were experiencing difficulties with specific aspects of the visual search process rather than experiencing a general reduction in processing speed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Of interest, while the feature extraction process involved in pre-attentive search appeared intact, the TBI group exhibited slower RTs for target absent compared to target present responses found compared to the control group. This suggests that the TBI participants may be experiencing difficulties with other processes involved, such as detecting or selecting the absence of a target (Potter, 2012). In addition, the slower overall RTs of the TBI participants in both the pre-attentive and attentive search conditions indicates that processes involved in the stimulus identification and/or response selection aspects of the search tasks are slowed relative to those of controls in the post-acute phase of recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It appears that participants with TBI either experienced a problem with detecting the absence of a target or used a higher standard than controls for saying the target was not there [27]. Research on the aging population has also found similar difficulties with target-absent responses [51,52]; however, the underlying mechanism needs further investigation. This finding along with the finding that divided, but not focused, attention is impacted following TBI, adds evidence that there are specific aspects of the visual search process that are more impacted following TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this and other conjunction search tasks, response time scales with the number of distractors and it is generally thought to be a serial process. In all studies of childhood development, both conjunctive and feature search performance improves (shorter reaction times) with age into early adulthood (Lobaugh, Cole, & Rovet, 1998; Merrill & Conners, 2013; Ruskin & Kaye, 1990; Thompson & Massaro, 1989), while studies with older subjects show declines with age (Amenedo, Lorenzo-Lopez, & Pazo-Alvarez, 2012; Bennett, Motes, Rao, & Rypma, 2012; Burton-Danner, Owsley, & Jackson, 2001; Cosman, Lees, Lee, Rizzo, & Vecera, 2012; Foster, Behrmann, & Stuss, 1995; Muller-Oehring, Schulte, Rohlfing, Pfefferbaum, & Sullivan, 2013; Potter, Grealy, Elliott, & Andres, 2012). Taken together, these studies suggest that performance on search tasks exhibits a U-shaped function over the lifespan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%