2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and the Use of Context in Ambiguity Resolution: Complex Changes From Simple Slowing

Abstract: Older and younger adults' abilities to use context information rapidly during ambiguity resolution were investigated. In Experiments 1 and 2, younger and older adults heard ambiguous words (e.g., fires) in sentences where the preceding context supported either the less frequent or more frequent meaning of the word. Both age groups showed good context use in offline tasks, but only young adults demonstrated rapid use of context in cross-modal naming. A 3rd experiment demonstrated that younger and older adults h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
43
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
43
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is consistent with Dagerman et al's (2006) observation of less effective on-line ambiguity resolution in older adults when semantic contextual support was not available. More generally, the pattern of aging effects we observe across the two context types provides a reconciliation of the disparate patterns that have been observed across the literature looking at age effects on ambiguity resolution (Balota & Duchek, 1991;Dagerman, MacDonald, & Harm, 2006;Hopkins, Kellas, & Paul, 1995;Meyer & Federmeier, 2010;Swaab, Brown, & Hagoort, 1998), in showing that when age-related differences will be observed depends on the nature of the context information available to support ambiguity resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This pattern is consistent with Dagerman et al's (2006) observation of less effective on-line ambiguity resolution in older adults when semantic contextual support was not available. More generally, the pattern of aging effects we observe across the two context types provides a reconciliation of the disparate patterns that have been observed across the literature looking at age effects on ambiguity resolution (Balota & Duchek, 1991;Dagerman, MacDonald, & Harm, 2006;Hopkins, Kellas, & Paul, 1995;Meyer & Federmeier, 2010;Swaab, Brown, & Hagoort, 1998), in showing that when age-related differences will be observed depends on the nature of the context information available to support ambiguity resolution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Just as elderly people benefit from select adult-controlled strategies that include reduced cognitive load, slower linguistic input, and intraturn pauses designed to facilitate syntactic analyses (Dagerman, McDonald, & Harm, 2006;Titon et al, 2006), so do children with auditory processing difficulties (Rowe, Pollard, & Rowe, 2005). Phrasal intraturn pauses improve the attention skills of children with auditory processing atypicalities (Rowe et al, 2005).…”
Section: Phrasal Intraturn Pausementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar qualitative effects of simple slowness have been suggested to explain effects of cognitive aging on the online use of semantic context in the resolution of lexical ambiguity. Dagerman, MacDonald, and Harm (2006) reported that young and elderly adults were equally good at using prior biasing context to resolve lexical ambiguity in an offline task, but that elderly adults failed to use this information (in time) during online comprehension. Their analysis suggested that variations across different experiments in whether or not elderly adults made good use of context information to interpret ambiguous words could be accounted for by variations in (a) the time available to retrieve and make use of context information, and (b) the strength of the context manipulation.…”
Section: The Time-course Of Discourse Prominence Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%