“…Such variability in the efficacy of music-based interventions may arise, in part, from the diversity of protocols that underlie MBIs (e.g., self-selected vs. clinician-selected music), the heterogeneity of clinical populations that are targeted by MBIs, and individual differences in the sensitivity to musical features that constitute the intervention (e.g., rhythm, melody, motor-movement, and social interactions during musical experiences) (Loui, 2020; Sousa et al, 2020; Vink & Hanser, 2018). While research has identified key neural networks that contribute to music processing (Koelsch, 2014; Loui & Przysinda, 2017), little is known about the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that are specifically engaged by MBIs (Quinci et al, (2022); Wang et al, (2020)) and how aging affects neural responses to musical structure (e.g., rhythm, melody, harmony) (Sauvé et al, 2019; Sutcliffe et al, 2020). Yet, understanding how MBIs engage the nervous system and the impact of aging on the neural processing of music has important implications for designing and implementing MBIs; understanding naturalistic music-listening and -making on brain function, cognitive health, and well-being; and explaining individual outcomes following the intervention (Ferreri et al, 2019; Sutcliffe et al, 2020; Tichko et al, 2020).…”