2003
DOI: 10.1177/002215540305100701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging of Skeletal Muscle Does Not Affect the Response of Satellite Cells to Denervation

Abstract: S U M M A R Y Satellite cells (SCs) are the main source of new fibers in regenerating skeletal muscles and the key contributor to extra nuclei in growing fibers during postnatal development. Aging results in depletion of the SC population and in the reduction of its proliferative activity. Although it has been previously determined that under conditions of massive fiber death in vivo the regenerative potential of SCs is not impaired in old muscle, no studies have yet tested whether advanced age is a factor tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar age-related declines have also been documented for epidermal stem cells (Michel et al, 1996) and skeletal muscle satellite cells (Snow, 1977;Gibson and Schultz, 1983;Dedkov et al, 2003). At least three factors could contribute to the difference between these systems and the hematopoetic system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Similar age-related declines have also been documented for epidermal stem cells (Michel et al, 1996) and skeletal muscle satellite cells (Snow, 1977;Gibson and Schultz, 1983;Dedkov et al, 2003). At least three factors could contribute to the difference between these systems and the hematopoetic system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…8a-c), which confirmed that some of these cells were indeed activated myoblasts localized between muscle fibers in the endomysial space. It has been shown earlier that activated satellite cells intensely express NCAM, and this protein is considered one of their markers (Irintchev et al 1994;Dedkov et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more recent study by Shavlakadze et al (2010) similarly showed a delay in the onset of regeneration after autografting muscle into a geriatric mouse host, though again the long-term formation of new muscle was unaffected and there was no effect of the geriatric host on regenerating muscle. Other animal studies which have used a variety of different models including chronic lowfrequency electrical stimulation (Putman et al 2001), denervation (Dedkov et al 2003) as well cross-transplantation in mdx mice (Boldrin et al 2009) have similarly observed no age related impairment to muscle repair. Taking the above into account, it is also possible to speculate that there is a slower activation of young cells cultured in old serum that might be detectable before day three of culture, but the data presented show that even if this were the case, these initial differences have no effect on later myogenic responses.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 97%