2015
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.2696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging Versus Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: Bone Composition and Maturation Kinetics at Actively-Forming Trabecular Surfaces of Female Subjects Aged 1 to 84 Years

Abstract: Bone strength depends on the amount of bone, typically expressed as bone mineral density (BMD), determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and on bone quality. Bone quality is a multifactorial entity including bone structural and material compositional properties. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether bone material composition properties at actively-forming trabecular bone surfaces in health are dependent on subject age, and to contrast them with postmenopausal osteoporosis patient… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
6
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This data directly shows that matrix properties at the same tissue age vary with the age of animal in which the tissue is formed. Similar mineral-to-matrix findings have recently been observed in a study of human biopsies from subjects 1 to 84 years old [31]. In addition, we note that several studies have looked at the effect of tissue age within a single animal age [32, 33], or less directly studied the interaction between the age of the animal and tissue age by examining numerous animal ages [34, 35], or inferring tissue age by osteonal morphology [36].…”
Section: 0 Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This data directly shows that matrix properties at the same tissue age vary with the age of animal in which the tissue is formed. Similar mineral-to-matrix findings have recently been observed in a study of human biopsies from subjects 1 to 84 years old [31]. In addition, we note that several studies have looked at the effect of tissue age within a single animal age [32, 33], or less directly studied the interaction between the age of the animal and tissue age by examining numerous animal ages [34, 35], or inferring tissue age by osteonal morphology [36].…”
Section: 0 Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The sample size of the study is modest but keeping in the context of non-traumatic ON, contrary to many studies 17, 25, 36, 37 , a control group was provided and the population size of the control group was larger than observed in most similar studies 15, 33, 35 . Age-related increase of crystallinity (and to some extent the decrease of the proteoglycan content) was an expected between-group difference 38 and was confirmed by multivariate analysis. Age differences between groups did not seem to have induced significant differences regarding the other parameters according to univariate analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…At each tissue age, the mineral/matrix ratio, nanoporosity (a surrogate of tissue water), glycosaminoglycan, lipid and pyridinoline content were determined, as previously described 18 . Results from bone histomorphometry, qBEI and Raman analysis were compared to paediatric reference data from healthy subjects, and type I OI patients 17 19-23 .…”
Section: Imaging (Qbei) and Raman Microspectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%