2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4581.2000.tb00352.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AGITATION DURING INCUBATION REDUCES THE TIME REQUIRED FOR A LYSINE MICROBIOLOGICAL GROWTH ASSAY USING AN ESCHERICHIA COLI AUXOTROPHIC MUTANT

Abstract: Microbiological assays involving Escherichia coli lysine auxotrophs must be optimized to facilitate routine use. Our objectives in this study were to characterize growth of an auxotrophic E. coli lysine mutant (American Type Culture Collection strain #23812) and examine the effect of agitation on E. coli mutant growth. A defined minimal salts basal medium was used and supplemented with various lysine concentrations. The E. coli lysine auxotroph responded to increasing lysine concentration with increasing optic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microbiological assays based on the growth response of an E. coli lysine auxotroph to external lysine, measured turbidimetrically, have been shown to be simple, inexpensive and specific (Payne et al 1977;Erickson et al 2002). The disadvantage of these methods is their relatively high level of time input ranging from 12 to 18 h (Li et al 2000;Prachaiyo and McLandsborough 2000;Erickson et al 1999). Even though some genetic alterations have been made to improve the lysine auxotrophic growth response (Li and Ricke 2003), and the OD-based growth assay can be completed in 8 h, the time required for the entire procedure still remains relatively inconvenient for a single day analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microbiological assays based on the growth response of an E. coli lysine auxotroph to external lysine, measured turbidimetrically, have been shown to be simple, inexpensive and specific (Payne et al 1977;Erickson et al 2002). The disadvantage of these methods is their relatively high level of time input ranging from 12 to 18 h (Li et al 2000;Prachaiyo and McLandsborough 2000;Erickson et al 1999). Even though some genetic alterations have been made to improve the lysine auxotrophic growth response (Li and Ricke 2003), and the OD-based growth assay can be completed in 8 h, the time required for the entire procedure still remains relatively inconvenient for a single day analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disadvantage of this method is that it is relatively time consuming, with 12–18 h required to complete the assay (Payne et al. 1977; Li et al. 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A microbiological assay based on increasing turbidity as a result of growth of an Escherichia coli lysine auxotroph unable to synthesize lysine and consequently requiring external lysine supplementation is simple, inexpensive and specific (Payne et al 1977;Erickson et al 1999a). The disadvantage of this method is that it is relatively time consuming, with 12-18 h required to complete the assay (Payne et al 1977;Li et al 2000). Even though some improvements have been made (Li and Ricke 2003), and the completion of the growth assay can be accomplished in 8 h, the time required for the entire procedure still remains relatively long.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2006). In addition, the induction‐based approach eliminates the 10‐h lysine depletion procedure which is a required step for the growth‐based lysine assay (Li et al. 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%