2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2021.107947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agitation in a microcarrier-based spinner flask bioreactor modulates homeostasis of human mesenchymal stem cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this time, the rotation speed was the minimum to suspend the microcarriers. The rotation speed can be increased without intensifying the shear force and affecting cell proliferation on the microcarriers (Jeske et al 2021 ) to achieve the weightless suspension of the microcarriers, reduce the speed as much as possible (LIOVIC et al 2012 ), and ensure the normal proliferation of cells while avoiding shedding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this time, the rotation speed was the minimum to suspend the microcarriers. The rotation speed can be increased without intensifying the shear force and affecting cell proliferation on the microcarriers (Jeske et al 2021 ) to achieve the weightless suspension of the microcarriers, reduce the speed as much as possible (LIOVIC et al 2012 ), and ensure the normal proliferation of cells while avoiding shedding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, microcarrier cultures had higher expression of canonical glycolysis related‐genes and lower autophagy‐related genes than the aggregate cultures. VWBRs have 10‐fold lower shear stress than stirred tank bioreactors or spinner flasks (Borys et al., 2021 ; Jeske et al., 2021 , 2023 ), which may be beneficial for EV biogenesis in microcarrier cultures. In addition, the aggregation‐induced integrated stress response (Bijonowski et al., 2020 ) and the possible nutrient diffusion limitation in the aggregate culture may expose the hiPSCs to more cellular stress than microcarrier culture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertical‐Wheel bioreactors (VWBRs) have previously been used for the production of hMSCs on microcarriers (Lembong et al., 2020 ), hPSC aggregates, hPSCs on microcarriers (Borys et al., 2021 ; Cuesta‐Gomez et al., 2023 ; Nogueira et al., 2021 ; Rodrigues et al., 2018 ; Vallabhaneni et al., 2023 ) and cerebellar spheroids (Silva et al., 2020 , 2021 ). The unique design of the hydrodynamics in VWBRs results in 10‐fold lower shear stress levels compared to traditional stirred tank bioreactors (0.1–0.3 dyn/cm 2 vs. 1–3 dyn/cm 2 , respectively) (Borys et al., 2021 , 2020 ; Jeske et al., 2021 , 2023 ). However, the use of VWBRs and the influence of different 3‐D hPSC organization for hPSC‐EV production has not been investigated to date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem cells expanded by microcarriers show advantages not only in the large-scale with a relatively low cost but also in the quality and reliability of the stem cells, including less heterogeneity [ 116 ] and better function in the downstream applications [ 117 , 118 , 119 ], compared to the ones expanded by the 2D cell culture systems. In addition, differences in morphology, surface markers, gene expression profiles, and secretome are observed between the microcarrier and conventional 2D systems in the stem cell culture [ 116 , 120 ]. The other characteristic of microcarrier cell culture is that cells can go through a bead-to-bead transfer [ 121 ], which simplifies the subculture process in the large-scale production of stem cells.…”
Section: Current 3d and Dynamic Cell Culture Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%