2024
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610222001041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agitation in cognitive disorders: Progress in the International Psychogeriatric Association consensus clinical and research definition

Abstract: Background: The International Psychogeriatric Association (IPA) published a provisional consensus definition of agitation in cognitive disorders in 2015. As proposed by the original work group, we summarize the use and validation of criteria in order to remove “provisional” from the definition. Methods: This report summarizes information from the academic literature, research resources, clinical guidelines, expert surveys, and patient and family advocates on the experience of use of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trial reported here differed from the previous 2 trials in that it required patients to meet the International Psychogeriatric Association definition of agitation at entry, which was not available at the time of the previous trials . Furthermore, a post hoc analysis of the first 2 trials indicated that patients who did not meet the CMAI factor 1 (aggressive behavior) positivity criterion at baseline had insufficient baseline agitation severity to show measurable change over time .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The trial reported here differed from the previous 2 trials in that it required patients to meet the International Psychogeriatric Association definition of agitation at entry, which was not available at the time of the previous trials . Furthermore, a post hoc analysis of the first 2 trials indicated that patients who did not meet the CMAI factor 1 (aggressive behavior) positivity criterion at baseline had insufficient baseline agitation severity to show measurable change over time .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Patients (a volunteer sample) were enrolled by investigators at 123 Alzheimer disease clinical trial sites in Europe (Bulgaria, Hungary, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Ukraine) and the United States. Key inclusion criteria were age 55 to 90 years; diagnosis of probable Alzheimer disease, defined by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria; Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 5 to 22 at screening and baseline; previous computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scan of the brain with findings consistent with a diagnosis of Alzheimer disease; a diagnosis of agitation that meets the International Psychogeriatric Association definition (which was a provisional definition at the time); onset of agitation at least 2 weeks prior to screening; Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) or NPI–Nursing Home version (NPI-NH) Agitation/Aggression domain score (frequency × severity) of 4 or greater at screening and baseline; requiring pharmacotherapy for the treatment of agitation in the investigator’s judgment after an evaluation for reversible factors (eg, pain, infection, polypharmacy) and a trial of nonpharmacological interventions (eg, redirecting behavior, group activities, music therapy); living in a care facility or community-based setting (not living alone); and having an identified caregiver who has sufficient contact to describe the patient’s symptoms and behavior. An additional required inclusion criterion based on positivity for Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) factor 1 (aggressive behavior [12 items: hitting, kicking, scratching, grabbing, pushing, hurting self or others, throwing things, cursing or verbal aggression, spitting, tearing things or destroying property, screaming, and biting]) was blinded to patients, caregivers, and investigators .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agitation is a very troublesome behavioral problem in AD with major impacts, including costs and caregiver burden. 62,63 In a community-dwelling study involving older adults with a range of cognitive impairments, the prevalence of agitation ranged from 8.3% to 48.9%. 64 Agitation increases with dementia severity, and even higher rates (> 50%) are observed in nursing homes.…”
Section: Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two different types of aggression – reactive and proactive – have been recognized. 62 The former seems to be more frequent in the context of dementia, while the second is mainly associated with psychotic phenomena. In line with this difference, it is worth noticing that agitation and psychosis usually do not load on the same behavioral domains (see above: Assessment and management of behavioral symptoms of AD).…”
Section: Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among NPS, agitation has gained the most attention because of its adverse clinical and prognostic impact and the lack of effective treatments for this condition. The International Psychogeriatric Association developed provisional criteria for agitation in 2014 with an update in 2023 [8,9 ▪ ]. These criteria require the presence of cognitive impairment or dementia, emotional distress accompanying behavioral changes, excessive motor activity or verbal or physical aggression, and symptoms causing excess disability that are not solely attributable to other psychiatric, medical, or substance-related disorders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%