2012
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AGN host galaxies at redshiftz ≈  0.7: peculiar or not?

Abstract: Aims. We perform a quantitative morphological comparison between the hosts of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and quiescent galaxies at intermediate redshifts (z ≈ 0.7). The imaging data are taken from the large HST/ACS mosaics of the GEMS and STAGES surveys. Our main aim is to test whether nuclear activity at this cosmic epoch is triggered by major mergers. Methods. Using images of quiescent galaxies and stars, we created synthetic AGN images to investigate the impact of an optical nucleus on the morphological a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For a negligible central point source, we found a typical systematic error of 20 % on galaxy sizes (see Fig. 7d in Böhm et al 2013). This value hence represents the systematic size error for galaxies with the light profiles of pure disks or disks with only weak bulges; this is the case for the vast majority of galaxies in our sample.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a negligible central point source, we found a typical systematic error of 20 % on galaxy sizes (see Fig. 7d in Böhm et al 2013). This value hence represents the systematic size error for galaxies with the light profiles of pure disks or disks with only weak bulges; this is the case for the vast majority of galaxies in our sample.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These are very small (<1 %) throughout our sample. To gain a more realistic estimate of the systematic errors on r d , we relied on our own previous analysis of HST/ACS images using GALFIT in Böhm et al (2013). In that work, we investigated the effect of an active galactic nucleus on the morphologies of host galaxies at redshifts 0.5 < z < 1.1 as quantified with GAL-FIT.…”
Section: Structural Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…06−0. 09) (Böhm et al 2013). Figure 13 (left panel) shows the rotation-curve asymmetry A vs. the morphological asymmetry A morph for cluster and field galaxies.…”
Section: Influence Of Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies claimed to find no significant excess of mergers in AGN hosts (Dunlop et al 2003;Sanchez et al 2004b;Grogin et al 2005;Li et al 2008;Gabor et al 2009;Tal et al 2009;Cisternas et al 2011;Kocevski et al 2012;Schawinski et al 2012;Bohm et al 2013). These studies report that a significant fraction of AGNs appear to reside in isolated disk-dominated galaxies for which internal processes are likely responsible for fueling their active nuclei.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%