2010
DOI: 10.1080/09764224.2010.11885439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agonistic Interactions between Humans and Two Species of Monkeys (Rhesus Monkey Macaca mulatta and Hanuman Langur Semnopithecus entellus) in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we test whether direct interactions with humans either constrain animals' activity budgets (time constraints hypothesis) or free up the time they can allocate to resting and social interactions (free time hypothesis) in an urban-dwelling population of rhesus macaques. Rhesus macaques inhabit a variety of interfaces, from agricultural areas to cities and temples, resulting in a close proximity between macaques and humans (Chauhan & Pirta, 2010a;Southwick & Siddiqi, 2011;Beisner et al, 2015). To date, studies have shown that such close proximity leads to frequent interactions between the two species, which can take both potentially negative (e.g., mutual aggression) and positive (e.g., humans provisioning the macaques) forms (Chauhan & Pirta, 2010a, b;Beisner et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we test whether direct interactions with humans either constrain animals' activity budgets (time constraints hypothesis) or free up the time they can allocate to resting and social interactions (free time hypothesis) in an urban-dwelling population of rhesus macaques. Rhesus macaques inhabit a variety of interfaces, from agricultural areas to cities and temples, resulting in a close proximity between macaques and humans (Chauhan & Pirta, 2010a;Southwick & Siddiqi, 2011;Beisner et al, 2015). To date, studies have shown that such close proximity leads to frequent interactions between the two species, which can take both potentially negative (e.g., mutual aggression) and positive (e.g., humans provisioning the macaques) forms (Chauhan & Pirta, 2010a, b;Beisner et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the recent past, the intensity of damage caused by monkeys has been perceived to be severe [ 8 , 9 , 18 ]. Consequently, people have been taking their own steps to reduce their losses [ 10 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, in urban towns and cities, macaques are sometimes regarded as a worrisome, potentially dangerous nuisance. Typical problem behaviors include physical aggression towards people, snatching bags, entering and damaging property, stealing food and other items, fouling and raiding garbage (Chauhan & Pirta, 2010a;Cortes & Shaw, 2006;Imam et al, 2002;Md-Zain et al, 2011;Sha et al, 2009;Shek, 2011;Southwick et al, 2005). The 'monkey problem may reach such proportions that urban macaques are regarded as a serious menace (Southwick & Siddiqi, 2011;Southwick et al, 2005;Srivastava & Begum, 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%