Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-79948-3_849
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrammatism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e selective, post-operative normalization of oral expression compared to the persistent grammatical disorder in written expression remains puzzling, especially in the absence of aphasia. Typically, spoken and written productions display similar error patterns in agrammatic aphasia subjects (Goodglass, 1993;Turkstra and ompson, 2011). To the best of our knowledge, the exceptional instances in which a production de cit selectively spared grammatical utterances in an output modality, while selectively a ecting them in the other, have only been reported in the context of aphasia (Miceli et al, 1983;Goodglass, 1993;Rapp and Caramazza, 1997;Miceli, 1999;Vandenborre and Mariën, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…e selective, post-operative normalization of oral expression compared to the persistent grammatical disorder in written expression remains puzzling, especially in the absence of aphasia. Typically, spoken and written productions display similar error patterns in agrammatic aphasia subjects (Goodglass, 1993;Turkstra and ompson, 2011). To the best of our knowledge, the exceptional instances in which a production de cit selectively spared grammatical utterances in an output modality, while selectively a ecting them in the other, have only been reported in the context of aphasia (Miceli et al, 1983;Goodglass, 1993;Rapp and Caramazza, 1997;Miceli, 1999;Vandenborre and Mariën, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… The selective, post-operative normalization of oral expression compared to the persistent grammatical disorder in written expression remains puzzling, especially in the absence of aphasia. Typically, spoken and written productions display similar error patterns in agrammatic aphasia subjects (Goodglass, 1993 ; Turkstra and Thompson, 2011 ). To the best of our knowledge, the exceptional instances in which a production deficit selectively spared grammatical utterances in an output modality, while selectively affecting them in the other, have only been reported in the context of aphasia (Miceli et al, 1983 ; Goodglass, 1993 ; Rapp and Caramazza, 1997 ; Miceli, 1999 ; Vandenborre and Mariën, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%