This provisional PDF corresponds to the article as it appeared upon acceptance.A copyedited and fully formatted version will be made available soon.
The final version may contain major or minor changes.
Subscription: Information about subscribing to Minerva Medica journals is online at:http://www.minervamedica.it/en/how-to-order-journals.php
Reprints and permissions: For information about reprints and permissionssend an email to: journals.dept@minervamedica.it -journals2.dept@minervamedica.it -journals6.dept@minervamedica.it EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Early interventions maximizing patient's involvement are essential to promote gait restoration and motor recovery after stroke. AIM: To evaluate the effects of a multimodal biofeedback training involving cycling augmented by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and balance exercises on walking ability and motor recovery. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (NCT02439515). SETTING: Inpatient rehabilitation facility. POPULATION: Subacute stroke survivors (less than 6 months from the first event) with an age of up to 90 years old. METHODS: 68 participants were randomly allocated to an experimental group, performing 15 sessions of biofeedback FES-cycling training followed by 15 sessions of biofeedback balance training (20 minutes each) in addition to usual care (70 minutes), and a control group performing 30 sessions (90 minutes) of usual care. Participants were evaluated before training, after 15 sessions, after 30 sessions, and at 6-month follow-up through: gait speed (primary outcome), spatio-temporal gait parameters, Six Minute Walking Test, Functional Independence Measure, Motricity Index, Trunk Control Test, Berg Balance Scale, and Fall Efficacy Scale. RESULTS: Both groups significantly improved over time, but no group and interaction effects were found for any outcomes. The 73% of the experimental group achieved a clinically meaningful change in gait speed compared to the 38% of the control group (p-value=0.048).These percentages were even more unbalanced for patients with a moderate to severe gait impairment at baseline (91% versus 36%; p-value=0.008).
COPYRIGHT© EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICAThis document is