2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement among student, parent and teacher ratings of school inclusion: A multitrait-multimethod analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings showed low consistencies between self-reports and teachers’ reports for both emotional and social inclusion, and slightly higher consistencies for academic self-concept (Venetz et al, 2019). The same applied to the parent version (Schwab et al, 2020). The low convergent validity between students’ self-report and other reports (teacher and parents) underlines the importance of including the student’s perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings showed low consistencies between self-reports and teachers’ reports for both emotional and social inclusion, and slightly higher consistencies for academic self-concept (Venetz et al, 2019). The same applied to the parent version (Schwab et al, 2020). The low convergent validity between students’ self-report and other reports (teacher and parents) underlines the importance of including the student’s perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion in education acts as one of the forms of implementation of the ecological imperative, including in relation to humans [9,10,11,12,28]. In the educational activities of universities, secondary schools and preschool institutions, it presupposes such an organization of educational and educational processes that would allow children, adolescents, youths and adults of different subcultures to interact with each other, realizing their internal needs for mutual assistance and service, for self-improvement and mutual improvement, in the exchange of knowledge and skills (competencies), experience, and in the appropriation and creation (research as "learning from") experience and competencies (L. Barton O.V.…”
Section: Research Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also gave birth to a model of subjective, individualized or "personalized" education, focused on the individuality of students. It also gave rise to a complementary model of inclusive education, requiring the inclusion of students with different educational needs and capabilities within the same educational system [9,10,11,12]. Each of these and other areas of implementation of the ecological imperative has become the subject of numerous studies, however, there are few studies devoted to their understanding as ecological ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the gap regarding social participation between students with and without SEN is often bigger in teacher ratings compared to students' ratings. Further, Venetz, Zurbriggen, and Schwab (2019) showed that the overlap between students' self-ratings and teachers' ratings of social inclusion is lower for students with SEN compared to students without SEN. Schwab, Zurbriggen, and Venetz (2020) identified a bias regarding the overlap of teachers' and students' ratings of students' social inclusion indicating a lower overlap for students with SEN compared to those without SEN. Moreover, teacher ratings of social inclusion showed more positive results compared to sociometric assessment techniques also in the study of de Monchy, Pijl, and Zandberg (2004).…”
Section: Students' and Teachers' Perspectives On Students' Friendshipsmentioning
confidence: 97%