2021
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/zymta
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement attraction error and timing profiles in continuous speech

Abstract: Until recently, most web-based psycholinguistic experiments have focused on simple responses such as button presses or typed text. In this paper, we compare two sentence production experiments carried out in the lab and in an unsupervised web-based setting in order to test the robustness of error patterns and speech timing effects in web-based experimental settings. The open-ended spoken responses generated in this task could elicit more variable and noisier recordings when conducted outside a controlled lab e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduced markedness effect we observe thus appears to be consistent with prior literature. In fact, we have since replicated the presence of increased singular attraction using materials from Experiment 1 in a web-based experiment (Kandel et al, 2021): we again observed a high number of PS errors and observed an even more reduced markedness effect, with little difference between singular and plural attraction (the attraction effect was 2% larger for singular attractors). The presence of singular attraction in our verb agreement experiments challenges the traditional interpretation of the markedness effect.…”
Section: The Markedness Effect and Influence Of Singular Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduced markedness effect we observe thus appears to be consistent with prior literature. In fact, we have since replicated the presence of increased singular attraction using materials from Experiment 1 in a web-based experiment (Kandel et al, 2021): we again observed a high number of PS errors and observed an even more reduced markedness effect, with little difference between singular and plural attraction (the attraction effect was 2% larger for singular attractors). The presence of singular attraction in our verb agreement experiments challenges the traditional interpretation of the markedness effect.…”
Section: The Markedness Effect and Influence Of Singular Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…We investigated whether subject phrases containing nouns of different number would lead to verb agreement errors and to delays in verb articulation, even when agreement was produced correctly. Experiment 1 is also reported as Experiment 1 in Kandel et al (2021), where it serves as a point of reference for a methodological comparison of in-lab and web-based speech data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%