2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement between the results of meta-analyses from case reports and from clinical studies regarding the efficacy of laronidase therapy in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis type I who initiated enzyme replacement therapy in adult age: An example of case reports meta-analyses as an useful tool for evidence-based medicine in rare diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the rarity of aceruloplasminemia, randomized controlled study designs are not feasible to explore clinical outcomes of iron chelation therapy. The value of aggregated case reports has recently been highlighted as an alternative means of systematically deriving evidence from the literature in rare diseases [11,12]. However, the rich source of information embedded in published case reports and case series has not yet been quantitatively investigated in such manner for aceruloplasminemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the rarity of aceruloplasminemia, randomized controlled study designs are not feasible to explore clinical outcomes of iron chelation therapy. The value of aggregated case reports has recently been highlighted as an alternative means of systematically deriving evidence from the literature in rare diseases [11,12]. However, the rich source of information embedded in published case reports and case series has not yet been quantitatively investigated in such manner for aceruloplasminemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, case reports are systematically excluded in systematic reviews in rare-disease research, especially when other designs with a higher level of evidence are included [12,15,[62][63][64][65]. Therefore, important innovations, which could contribute to a better management of the patient treated with orphan drugs, are systematically excluded from systematic reviews of rare diseases [2,13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the new studies assessing these proposals were usually case reports [31,50,51,57,59,60]. Therefore, the evidence and innovations provided by case reports will take a long time to be incorporated into clinical studies on rare diseases [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations