2017
DOI: 10.17851/2237-2083.25.3.1327-1366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement effects of gender and number in pronominal coreference processing in Brazilian Portuguese

Abstract: Abstract:Pronominal coreference is a syntactic dependency in which pronouns are bound to previous referents in discourse. One of the keys to understanding coreference processing is memory, since information that has already been interpreted and stored must be integrated with new material in real time. The aim of this research is to investigate how pronominal antecedents are retrieved from memory, and more precisely to clarify the role of structural constraints, agreement features and decay factors. Since Brazi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parker et al (2017), however, point out that the cue-based theory of retrieval lacks a clear theory of cues: the account offered by Martin and McElree (2008), for example, is not explicit on how grammatical and interpretive constraints are mapped onto retrieval cues. Although sketched implementations of retrieval cues are many in psycholinguistic theories, we can broadly group them into two: (i) equal combination, in which all cues are combined equally at retrieval, as in other models of memory retrieval (CLARK; GRONLUND, 1996); and (ii) non-uniform mapping, in which only a subset of features is used as retrieval cues (DILLON, 2011;DILLON et al, 2013) or contribute in a weighted cue-combinatorics scheme (PARKER; PHILLIPS, 2014;2017). Given empirical evidence obtained so far, it is very unlikely that all linguistic information is used together with the same weights in retrieval (see PARKER et al, 2017 and references there).…”
Section: Retrieval Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parker et al (2017), however, point out that the cue-based theory of retrieval lacks a clear theory of cues: the account offered by Martin and McElree (2008), for example, is not explicit on how grammatical and interpretive constraints are mapped onto retrieval cues. Although sketched implementations of retrieval cues are many in psycholinguistic theories, we can broadly group them into two: (i) equal combination, in which all cues are combined equally at retrieval, as in other models of memory retrieval (CLARK; GRONLUND, 1996); and (ii) non-uniform mapping, in which only a subset of features is used as retrieval cues (DILLON, 2011;DILLON et al, 2013) or contribute in a weighted cue-combinatorics scheme (PARKER; PHILLIPS, 2014;2017). Given empirical evidence obtained so far, it is very unlikely that all linguistic information is used together with the same weights in retrieval (see PARKER et al, 2017 and references there).…”
Section: Retrieval Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leitão, Peixoto & Santos (2008),Alves (2016),Alves (2017) and Alves (2019) also carried out experiments manipulating gender. However, the most crucial manipulations and results are related to Principle B(CHOMSKY 1981), according to which a pronoun may not have its antecedent in a certain syntactic intrasentential domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%