2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2014.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement of different methods for assessing sleep characteristics: a comparison of two actigraphs, wrist and hip placement, and self-report with polysomnography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
139
2
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
17
139
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Self-reported sleep duration often differs considerably from objective measures of sleep duration, and may underestimate or overestimate sleep duration compared to these other methods. [121][122][123] Polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy were utilized as objective measures in some studies. Actigraphy has better sensitivity (detecting sleep) than specificity (detecting wake).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported sleep duration often differs considerably from objective measures of sleep duration, and may underestimate or overestimate sleep duration compared to these other methods. [121][122][123] Polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy were utilized as objective measures in some studies. Actigraphy has better sensitivity (detecting sleep) than specificity (detecting wake).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the questionnaires used in the current study are well-validated instruments, and the self-report sleep measure (BIS) has been shown to correspond well with objective sleep measures, including polysomnography (PSG) [19]. Although self-reported sleep parameters typically differ from those obtained from objective assessments [27], recent studies have shown that such self-report sleep assessments can be recommended for the characterization of sleep parameters in both clinical and population-based research [28]. Still, the BIS has not been validated for sleep problems in pregnancy.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although there is evidence to suggest wrist actigraphy is superior to actigraphy from a hip site in terms of correspondence with polysomnography, wrist actigraphy is based on upper extremity movement during sleep and tends to overestimate the amount of sleep and underestimate wakefulness. 14 Polysomnography, of course, would be necessary to capture more fully the sleep disturbances during stable and exacerbating states. However, the American Academy of Sleep Medicine does state that, in when polysomnography is not available, actigraphy is indicated as a method to estimate TST in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%