2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01928-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement of ocular response analyzer cornea compensated IOP with corvis ST biomechanical IOP following Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also found that PRK had lesser postoperative IOP change compared with LASIK. Their findings were consistent with a separate study from Salouti et al [34 ▪ ], which compared ORA and Corvis ST-bIOP tonometers after Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) and found that the bIOP method had less variation in IOP after the operation. They also found that the two methods had weak agreement before and after FS-LASIK surgery and should not be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Postoperative Considerationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…They also found that PRK had lesser postoperative IOP change compared with LASIK. Their findings were consistent with a separate study from Salouti et al [34 ▪ ], which compared ORA and Corvis ST-bIOP tonometers after Femtosecond Laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK) and found that the bIOP method had less variation in IOP after the operation. They also found that the two methods had weak agreement before and after FS-LASIK surgery and should not be used interchangeably.…”
Section: Postoperative Considerationssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Furthermore, in terms of evaluating the impact of biomechanical parameters, the software versions have been changed several times with new parameters. The newer Corvis ST version (1.6r2042) includes the biomechanically corrected IOP (bIOP) ( Joda et al, 2015 ; Salouti et al, 2022 ) and DCR parameters like max inverse radius (MIR), deformation amplitude ratio (DARM) [1 mm], deformation amplitude ratio (DARM) [2 mm], pachy slope (PS), Ambrosio relational thickness to the horizontal profile (ARTh), integrated radius (IR), stiffness parameter at applanation 1 (SP-A1) ( Jędzierowska and Koprowski, 2019 ), and Corvis Biomechanical Index (CBI) ( Vinciguerra et al, 2016a ; Vinciguerra et al, 2017a ; Vinciguerra et al, 2017b ). For diagnosis and follow-up purposes, the reliability of these measurements is important, and its evaluation is carried out by analyzing repeatability and reproducibility factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the ORA and Corvis ST are the only two clinically available devices for corneal biomechanics calculation, and both instruments have been used widely in the clinic for the diagnosis of corneal pathologies (keratoconus [157] , [158] , glaucoma [156] , [159] ) and evaluation of medical or surgical treatment (e.g., refractive surgery [160] and CXL [161] , [162] ). However, these two clinical instruments suffer from several limitations.…”
Section: Methods Of In Vivo Corneal Biomechanics A...mentioning
confidence: 99%