1983
DOI: 10.1080/00949658308810649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agreement probabilities for some CPIT—neyman smooth tests

Abstract: The CPIT transformations do not, in general, give the same set of transformed values for different orderings of the observations in a sample. When these transformations are followed by a test of uniformity to give an overall goodness-of-fit test, it is possible to obtain different results for different orderings of a sample. We consider here the probability that two goodness-of-fit tests based on randomly selected permutations of the same sample and a Neyman smooth uniformity test will .~agree in their conclus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quantity of relevance here is the probability that two tests will agree in their conclusions. Quesenberry and Dietz (1983) considered this probability for Neyman smooth tests made on the U's from random permutations of a sample. They gave empirical evidence that these agreement probabilities are very high in many cases of interest and are bounded below by the value 2/3 for all cases considered.…”
Section: Sequential Nature Of Cpit'smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantity of relevance here is the probability that two tests will agree in their conclusions. Quesenberry and Dietz (1983) considered this probability for Neyman smooth tests made on the U's from random permutations of a sample. They gave empirical evidence that these agreement probabilities are very high in many cases of interest and are bounded below by the value 2/3 for all cases considered.…”
Section: Sequential Nature Of Cpit'smentioning
confidence: 99%