2003
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2003.tb00045.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agri‐environmental Instruments for an Integrated Rural Policy: An Economic Analysis

Abstract: The new Rural Development Regulation of the EU reflects the shift of attention within rural areas from agricultural production towards rural development and embraces both, farmers and non-farm residents. While agricultural production is required to comply with environmental standards, rural areas also have to fulfil the growing demand for landscape, outdoor recreation and wildlife conservation. This paper develops a model of a rural area where farmers and non-farm residents live together. A central government … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rural areas, local authorities have begun to support the development of amenities which may result in several studies conclusion that amenities (eg. Environmental amenities) are a factor of rural development (Green 2001, Deller et al 2001, Feinerman and Komen 2003, Fuller et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In rural areas, local authorities have begun to support the development of amenities which may result in several studies conclusion that amenities (eg. Environmental amenities) are a factor of rural development (Green 2001, Deller et al 2001, Feinerman and Komen 2003, Fuller et al 2005.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these two policy components, AES’s have been studied widely under different perspectives in Europe since the beginning of the 1990s, including both ex ante and ex post analyses, as well as by way of papers directly addressing policy design (see, for example, Dupraz et al. , 2002; Feinerman and Komen, 2003; Bonnieux et al. , 2004; Latacz‐Lohmann, 2004; Fraser, 2009 and Quillérou and Fraser, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feinerman and Komen pointed out that after back home to start undertaking, rural laborer's will encounter livelihood risks from three levels, and the livelihood risks encountered at this time will be more risky. e sources of risks mainly include capital, technology, and management, and further pointed out that once rural laborer's fail to start a business, they will follow the rational logic of survival to minimize the risks and make another choice of livelihood [14]. e study by Cieslik and D'Aoust found that education level, work experience, personal ability, partners, local resources, and industry threshold have a very significant impact on rural laborer's choice of entrepreneurial mode [15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%