1998
DOI: 10.1021/es970598j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural Chemical Movement through a Field-Size Watershed in Iowa:  Subsurface Hydrology and Distribution of Nitrate in Groundwater

Abstract: A 40-ha field is under study in the loess hills of southwestern Iowa to determine the impact of corn production in ridge-tilled soils on the nitrate-nitrogen loading in groundwater. Within the vadose zone, nitrate concentration between June 1989 and December 1991 ranged from <10 to >80 mg/L. Well water concentrations increased from <5 mg/L in 1972 to >60 mg/L in 1994. In both hydrogeologic compart ments, time of sampling and landscape position are important factors influencing concentrations. The unsaturated z… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this topography, water that infiltrates through the hill-top and side-slope soils emerges later as stream baseflow at the foot of the watershed. Nitrate was often present in baseflow concentrations exceeding 10 mg L' 1 in the watershed managed with ridge-tillage which was monitored extensively (32,33,34). This was consistent with the measurement of high nitrate concentrations in both the vadose zone and the saturated zone, with some concentrations exceeding 50 mg Ν L" 1 in the same ridge-tilled watershed (33,34).…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Loss Ofnos-nfrom Moldboard Plow (Mp) Chisupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this topography, water that infiltrates through the hill-top and side-slope soils emerges later as stream baseflow at the foot of the watershed. Nitrate was often present in baseflow concentrations exceeding 10 mg L' 1 in the watershed managed with ridge-tillage which was monitored extensively (32,33,34). This was consistent with the measurement of high nitrate concentrations in both the vadose zone and the saturated zone, with some concentrations exceeding 50 mg Ν L" 1 in the same ridge-tilled watershed (33,34).…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Loss Ofnos-nfrom Moldboard Plow (Mp) Chisupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Nitrate was often present in baseflow concentrations exceeding 10 mg L' 1 in the watershed managed with ridge-tillage which was monitored extensively (32,33,34). This was consistent with the measurement of high nitrate concentrations in both the vadose zone and the saturated zone, with some concentrations exceeding 50 mg Ν L" 1 in the same ridge-tilled watershed (33,34). In the ridge-till watershed, NO3-N leaching loss accounted for 16% of the cumulative fertilizer Ν input from 1968 to 1991, with NQ5-N and NH4-N loss in surface runoff accounting for only 1% of the fertilizer Ν input (33).…”
Section: Figure 2 Relative Loss Ofnos-nfrom Moldboard Plow (Mp) Chimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imbalances in detailed studies at smaller scales, where plant and soil processes are carefully accounted for, are more difficult to explain than in large scale balances (Addiscott 1995;Lowrance 1992;Steinheimer et al 1998). For example, analysis of the fates of fertilizer N added over 22 years in an Iowa watershed with continuous corn show large amounts of "unaccounted for (lost or stored) N" (Figure 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible assumption is that nitrate may have a long residence time in a catchment due to hydrological processes. Evidence from isotopic studies (Bölke and Denver, 1995), from groundwater monitoring (Steinheimer et al, 1998;Molénat et al, 2002) or from fractal analysis of stream chloride and sodium Neal and Kirchner, 2000) suggests that even shallow groundwater may constitute an important reservoir for solutes. Thus, nitrate losses would be essentially transport-limited and stream concentration would be determined by a source little influenced by annual variations in the soil nitrate supply (Trudgill et al, 1991) so that the annual mean concentration should be almost constant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%