1974
DOI: 10.2307/134040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural Implement Tariffs, the National Policy, and Income Distribution in the Wheat Economy

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.Agricultural implement tariffs, the national policy, and income distribution in the wheat economy. The paper deals with the effects of the national policy tariffs on farm implem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The transformative expansion of many Atlantic economies during the last decades of the nineteenth century has prompted efforts to understand the causes and consequences of differential performance across nations and industries during this period (O'Rourke and Williamson 1999). The macroeconomic effects associated with declining ocean freight rates (Harley 1980(Harley , 1988(Harley , 1989, expanding railway networks (Fogel 1964;Hawke and Higgins 1981;Lewis 1981;Norrie 1974), resource exploitation (Donald 1915;Prentice 2010;Wright 1990) and changing trade policies (Irwin 2000a, b;Lehmann and O'Rourke 2011;Schularick and Solomou 2011;Taussig 1931) have been extensively documented. Because iron and steel industries were large and influential technological leaders, they have been used to probe specific aspects or examples of market expansion and technological advance stemming from these changes (Allen 1977;Burn 1961;Davis and Irwin 2008;Evans and Ryden 2005;Inwood 1987;Temin 1964;Warren 1970Warren , 1973.…”
Section: Development Patterns: Producing Pig Iron In a Small Open Eco...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformative expansion of many Atlantic economies during the last decades of the nineteenth century has prompted efforts to understand the causes and consequences of differential performance across nations and industries during this period (O'Rourke and Williamson 1999). The macroeconomic effects associated with declining ocean freight rates (Harley 1980(Harley , 1988(Harley , 1989, expanding railway networks (Fogel 1964;Hawke and Higgins 1981;Lewis 1981;Norrie 1974), resource exploitation (Donald 1915;Prentice 2010;Wright 1990) and changing trade policies (Irwin 2000a, b;Lehmann and O'Rourke 2011;Schularick and Solomou 2011;Taussig 1931) have been extensively documented. Because iron and steel industries were large and influential technological leaders, they have been used to probe specific aspects or examples of market expansion and technological advance stemming from these changes (Allen 1977;Burn 1961;Davis and Irwin 2008;Evans and Ryden 2005;Inwood 1987;Temin 1964;Warren 1970Warren , 1973.…”
Section: Development Patterns: Producing Pig Iron In a Small Open Eco...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was in part due to the poor growing conditions that defined the era, but additionally the abundance of labor brought on significant differences in immigration policies between the countries at the time (Lew & Cater, 2018). The availability of labor resulted in lower wage expectations in Canada; when combined with the relatively higher cost of tractors and equipment in Canada (due to Canada/US tariffs), the speed of technology adoption in the region was reduced despite evident efficiency gains (Keay, 2000; Lew & Cater, 2018; Norrie, 1974; Wylie, 1989).…”
Section: Early Developments Influencing G × E × M Interactions In Wes...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The reader might object to the assumption that the tariff protects consumption goods but not capital goods -especially in view of the importance given to Canada's tariff on agricultural implements. See, for example, Norrie (1974). One possibility would be to assume that final goods receiving protection serve both as consumption and as capital goods.…”
Section: Technological Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it has been argued that the protection of labour intensive secondary manufacturing industries has raised real wages above the level that would prevail under free trade, and encouraged more rapid population growth through immigration (see Barber, 1955 andDales, 1966). Second, the tariff has been interpreted as a scheme for developing and redistributing real income towards Ontario and Quebec at the expense of the West (see Norrie, 1978). Third, it has been argued that tariffs are partly responsible for the substantial degree of direct foreign investment in the manufacturing sector, and the development of a branch-plant economy (see Eastman andStykolt, 1967 andHorst, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%