2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural information systems acceptance and continuance in rural communities: A consumption values perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these efforts, ICT projects often encounter a range of challenges (Zewge et al, 2014) and the benefits do not reach those who are most disadvantaged (Zewge & Dittrich, 2017), failing in achieving the goals of such projects (Venkatesh et al, 2019). A variety of reasons have been reported in the literature that can be attributed to this such as failing to capture the underlying motivations of intended users (Afful-Dadzie et al, 2022), lack of beneficiary participation (Walton & Heeks, 2011), poorly understood technology needs (Zewge et al, 2014). In this context, it is therefore important to consider stakeholders and their needs while developing ICT4D interventions (Islam & Grönlund, 2007;Karanasios & Slavova, 2019).…”
Section: User Perspectives In Agricultural Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these efforts, ICT projects often encounter a range of challenges (Zewge et al, 2014) and the benefits do not reach those who are most disadvantaged (Zewge & Dittrich, 2017), failing in achieving the goals of such projects (Venkatesh et al, 2019). A variety of reasons have been reported in the literature that can be attributed to this such as failing to capture the underlying motivations of intended users (Afful-Dadzie et al, 2022), lack of beneficiary participation (Walton & Heeks, 2011), poorly understood technology needs (Zewge et al, 2014). In this context, it is therefore important to consider stakeholders and their needs while developing ICT4D interventions (Islam & Grönlund, 2007;Karanasios & Slavova, 2019).…”
Section: User Perspectives In Agricultural Information Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main characteristics of rural communities is the complexity of their worldview and economic, social, productive and environmental structures (Rotz et al, 2019;Adom, 2019;Lowery et al, 2020;Winter et al, 2021;Tan & Zhou, 2022;Bernard et al, 2023); This complexity comes from their own ways of life, their practices and knowledge about their territory, and the vision of development embedded in the customs and ancestral knowledge of the people, complex processes of productive economic practices that cohabit in their territories (Musekiwa & Mandiyanike, 2017;Cavaye & Ross, 2022), processes and dynamics that generate changes and transformation that operate in the search for the well-being of its inhabitants, a challenge that is the responsibility of local actors (Vázquez-Maguirre, 2020;Sanders et al, 2023;Ayaviri-Nina et al, 2023). The importance of the study of rural communities lies in the production and provision systems of basic foods, the production of inputs for industries, transfer of resources to other sectors, management of natural resources, generation of local and regional economies, Higher concentration activities are found in agriculture and livestock (Afful-Dadzie et al, 2022;Azumah et al, 2023;Tshikovhi et al, 2023;Ramaano, 2023). Over time, rural communities adopted forms of resilience in response to economic and social crises, which are part of their way of life, knowledge and experience expressed as intangible capital, linked to the vision of the development of localities (Lucian, 2018;Paul, 2020;Kalogiannidis et al, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research focuses on the usage of online food delivery (OFD) services, followed by smart systems for agriculture, rural e-commerce, agricultural information systems, traceability systems in agri-food supply chains, etc. [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies identified various motivating factors for the use of these systems, such as human attitudes and subjective norms [14], understanding the underlying motivations of intended users [16], perceived usefulness, perceived satisfaction, trust, and social influence [17] [19], expected performance, perceived task-technology fit [19], perceived control and perceived cost of system installation and operation, group identification and conformity to its expectations [18], convenience motivation, hedonic motivation, cost saving, and time reduction in shopping [15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation