DOI: 10.20868/upm.thesis.44503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural insurance policies in Spain and the EU: an analysis of existent and new risk management tools focusing on indirect risk assessment, and asymmetric information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(77 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results are in accordance with other risk management tools studies; the benefits of risk management tools are shown for coffee (Mohan, 2007) and other agricultural products (Bielza et al, 2004;Chuku and Okoye, 2009;Castañeda, 2016;Turvey, 2001;Tauser and Cajka, 2014;Rusnáková, 2015;Capitanio et al, 2013). For coffee, hedging contracts and price stabilization would reduce the effect of volatility price and bring a best price for growers in the domestic market (Mohan, 2007;Malan, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation results are in accordance with other risk management tools studies; the benefits of risk management tools are shown for coffee (Mohan, 2007) and other agricultural products (Bielza et al, 2004;Chuku and Okoye, 2009;Castañeda, 2016;Turvey, 2001;Tauser and Cajka, 2014;Rusnáková, 2015;Capitanio et al, 2013). For coffee, hedging contracts and price stabilization would reduce the effect of volatility price and bring a best price for growers in the domestic market (Mohan, 2007;Malan, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Due to lack of information about fire and hail events, we assumed the probability at 5% percent. A similar value is used by Castañeda (2016) study. Next, we simulated the expected benefits and certainty equivalent with the @Risk Software for Robusta and Arabica coffee.…”
Section: Arabica Robustamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sistem, çiftçiler tarafından ödenen primlerin bir havuzda toplandığı ve bu havuzdan doğrudan çiftçilere ödeme yapıldığı kar amacı gütmeyen bir havuz sistemine dayanmaktadır. Hükümet herhangi bir felaket yardımı sağlamamakta ancak çiftçilerin ürünlerini sigortaladıkları primlerin %50'sini karşılamaktadır (Castañeda Vera, 2016). İtalya, doğrudan felaket yardımı ve tarımsal sigorta için prim desteği olmak üzere çift sistemli bir uygulama gerçekleştirmektedir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified