2020
DOI: 10.5751/es-11825-250402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural intensification and risk in water-constrained hard-rock regions: a social-ecological systems study of horticulture cultivation in western India

Abstract: Developing countries frequently find their poverty reduction initiatives to be at odds with promotion of sustainable practices. In India too, agricultural intensification through horticulture cultivation is an important government strategy to raise farm incomes but its mechanisms and implications have not been critically analyzed. Our objective is to characterize this intensification and explore conditions under which its goals may be achieved while ensuring equity in access to ecological services and resilien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many schemes had not accounted for non-economic losses that might include health impacts, damage to wildlife or loss of biodiversity (Bahinipati, 2020). As an example, a government scheme to expand access to groundwater irrigation may make farms more productive in the short term (and sustain incomes) but may not foster longer-term resilience as overutilisation of the water source or intensification of production ultimately causes negative environmental impacts (Prasad and Sohoni, 2020). Similar paradoxes can include disinvestment in education in favour of immediate employment in low-skill jobs or encouraging adaptation towards income diversification where specialisation in livestock activities may be a more drought resilient strategy in some circumstances (Gerber and Mirzabaev, 2017).…”
Section: Macro-level Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many schemes had not accounted for non-economic losses that might include health impacts, damage to wildlife or loss of biodiversity (Bahinipati, 2020). As an example, a government scheme to expand access to groundwater irrigation may make farms more productive in the short term (and sustain incomes) but may not foster longer-term resilience as overutilisation of the water source or intensification of production ultimately causes negative environmental impacts (Prasad and Sohoni, 2020). Similar paradoxes can include disinvestment in education in favour of immediate employment in low-skill jobs or encouraging adaptation towards income diversification where specialisation in livestock activities may be a more drought resilient strategy in some circumstances (Gerber and Mirzabaev, 2017).…”
Section: Macro-level Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The irrigation scheme forms part of wider and long-standing efforts by the Government of Maharashtra to solve problems of water scarcity in drought-prone rural areas (Government of Maharashtra (GoM), 2018; see also Joy et al, 2014;Shah et al, 2021). Thanks to it, it is possible for farmers like Vidya and Renie to irrigate their farms throughout the year and to cultivate both traditional crops, such as millets and pulses, as well as commercial cash crops like flowers, vegetables, fruits and spices (see also Joy et al, 2014;Prasad and Sohoni, 2020). For the farmers of Pravah, the possibility to access irrigation water from the new system marks a significant transition: from an earlier period characterized by subsistence rain-fed farming, scarce groundwater resources and labour migration to a comparatively prosperous present where they can irrigate market crops with plenty of wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%