2014
DOI: 10.5367/oa.2014.0172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural Research — From Recommendation Domains to Arenas for Interaction

Abstract: A bstract: Agricultural research designs tend to be bounded by agroecological conditions, farming systems and other dimensions assumed to be homogeneous for the population of interest (that is, a recommendation domain or population for whom a technology or practice is expected to be relevant). Scaling is then a question of'rolling out' results across the domain. But what if technology adoption and institutional context explain the variance in the output of smallholders, and agricultural development is also a q… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, an agricultural innovation platform can be used as a way of bringing farmers of the two areas together to enable knowledge exchange and learning from one another, so as to foster innovations based on their knowledge. Indeed, innovation platforms provide the social space in which opportunities can be created, tested and transformed into changes in institutional regimes [68].…”
Section: Linking the Current With The Future Farming Contexts: Implicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, an agricultural innovation platform can be used as a way of bringing farmers of the two areas together to enable knowledge exchange and learning from one another, so as to foster innovations based on their knowledge. Indeed, innovation platforms provide the social space in which opportunities can be created, tested and transformed into changes in institutional regimes [68].…”
Section: Linking the Current With The Future Farming Contexts: Implicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although networks and institutions, in general, are considered important in the context of innovation systems and innovation capacity (Röling et al, 2014;Spielman et al, 2008;Yami, 2016) it was not clear to me to what extent the soft system in our case had to expand further (i.e. beyond grassroots level) and how networks and institutions were decisive for the participatory process.…”
Section: Scaling Participatory Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The concept of Agricultural Innovation Systems (AIS) takes a wider perspective and tries to combine efforts of extension, education, knowledge institutes and commercial partners to achieve innovation by effectively facilitating the implementation of relevant novel technology. Building institutions, networks and platforms in this way is assumed to result in change, not only in the form of improved practices but also at an institutional level (Biggs, 2007;Klerkx et al, 2010;Röling et al, 2014;Schut et al, 2015a;Spielman et al, 2008;Suchiradipta and Ray, 2015;Wood et al, 2014;Yami, 2016).…”
Section: Scaling Participatory Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, farmer-to-farmer videos approach embedded in agricultural innovation platforms can be a promising approach. Innovation platforms provide the social space that enables knowledge exchange and learning and in which opportunities can be created, tested and transformed into changes in institutional regimes (Röling et al , 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%