2023
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-023-00826-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation for the Development of Transgenic Crops; Present and Future Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Protocols for regeneration of whole plants from poplar protoplasts have been described previously [314]. Potential limitations of agrotransformation also include the random integration of T-DNA into the plant genome, which can lead to either overexpression of the transgene or its silencing depending on the functional context of the chromatin; the sensitivity of plant lines to Agrobacterium strains can vary dramatically (some lines can be completely resistant, so their agrotransformation is impossible) and cannot be used to alter several genomic targets at once [315]. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies are being developed for plants, and poplar in particular, that can overcome some of the limitations of agrotransformation.…”
Section: Development Of Sustainable Geneticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protocols for regeneration of whole plants from poplar protoplasts have been described previously [314]. Potential limitations of agrotransformation also include the random integration of T-DNA into the plant genome, which can lead to either overexpression of the transgene or its silencing depending on the functional context of the chromatin; the sensitivity of plant lines to Agrobacterium strains can vary dramatically (some lines can be completely resistant, so their agrotransformation is impossible) and cannot be used to alter several genomic targets at once [315]. CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technologies are being developed for plants, and poplar in particular, that can overcome some of the limitations of agrotransformation.…”
Section: Development Of Sustainable Geneticallymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the conventional strategies used for functional characterization of plant genes and genetic improvement of agricultural crops, which are complicated and laborious-, time-consuming, CRISPR-Cas, especially CRISPR-Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes , has been proved in plant biology and provides more effective and time-saving methods with precise genetic manipulation of target genes ( Hsu et al., 2014 ; Liu et al., 2016 ). However, while CRISPR-Cas9 has enabled various genome editing applications, such as indels production, precise nucleotide substitution, gene-expression regulation, multiplexed and high-throughput gene editing in a variety of model plants and crop species, the recalcitrance of efficient genetic transformation severely hinders the application of CRISPR-Cas9 in the CWRs ( Rahman et al., 2023 ). Consequently, due to the lack of efficient CRISPR-Cas9 editing system, gene function verification of most CWRs in situ still cannot be carried out.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%