2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02396.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change

Abstract: To date, projections of European crop yields under climate change have been based almost entirely on the outputs of crop-growth models. While this strategy can provide good estimates of the effects of climatic factors, soil conditions and management on crop yield, these models usually do not capture all of the important aspects related to crop management, or the relevant environmental factors. Moreover, crop-simulation studies often have severe limitations with respect to the number of crops covered or the spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
264
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(124 reference statements)
8
264
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The database for the area of interest included daily data on minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation and global radiation sums, as well as daily mean wind speed and water vapor pressure. Using AgriClim (Trnka et al, 2012) and SoilClim (Hlavinka et al, 2011) software packages, daily soil water contents in two layers (0-0.4 and 0.4-1.3 m below soil surface) were calculated, as well as values of the standard precipitation index (SPI) according to McKee et al (1993), the selfcalibrated Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and the Palmer Z-index (ZIND) according to Palmer (1965), as well as the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) according to Vicente-Serrano et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database for the area of interest included daily data on minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation and global radiation sums, as well as daily mean wind speed and water vapor pressure. Using AgriClim (Trnka et al, 2012) and SoilClim (Hlavinka et al, 2011) software packages, daily soil water contents in two layers (0-0.4 and 0.4-1.3 m below soil surface) were calculated, as well as values of the standard precipitation index (SPI) according to McKee et al (1993), the selfcalibrated Palmer drought severity index (PDSI) and the Palmer Z-index (ZIND) according to Palmer (1965), as well as the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) according to Vicente-Serrano et al (2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For downward shortwave radiation flux, PFD, WFD, and WFDEI perform a monthly correction of reanalysis data, whereas the correction used in S14FD and GRASP is based on 12 monthly climatology (section A3). Some agroclimatic index values that use downward shortwave radiation flux as the input [Trnka et al, 2011] probably differ by forcing data set; therefore, the use of different forcing data sets as the reference climatology in the bias correction of GCM data would be a nonnegligible source of uncertainty in their projections.…”
Section: 1002/2017jd026613mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such impacts are well recognized and have been widely reported over the recent decades (Ritcey and Wu, 1999;Olesen et al, 2000a;Orlandini et al, 2008;Bindi and Olesen, 2011;Hatfield and Singer, 2011;Tao and Zhang, 2011;Trnka et al, 2011). Changes in the mean and variability of temperature and rainfall patterns have direct effects on crop yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%