Diverse crop rotations sustain crop productivity by increasing crop water productivity and improving soil structure. Th e objective of this study was to compare two 4-yr winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) rotations in terms of grain yield, available soil water, and water productivity along with continuous winter wheat. A fi eld study was conducted from 1996 through 2015 on a deep silt loam soil near Tribune, KS. Th e study consisted of three crop rotations: continuous annual wheat (WW), wheat-wheat-sorghumfallow (WWSF), and wheat-sorghum-sorghum-fallow (WSSF). Grain yield, biomass, water productivity, and soil water were all greater for sorghum aft er wheat compared with sorghum aft er sorghum. Similarly, grain yield, biomass, water productivity, and soil water were all greater for wheat aft er fallow compared with wheat aft er wheat. Th e yield of the second wheat crop was 80% of the fi rst wheat crop in WWSF, whereas the yield of a second sorghum was only 63% of the fi rst sorghum crop in WSSF. Th e average crop water productivity (7 kg ha -1 mm -1 ) of the WSSF rotation was greater than the other rotations. On average, the WSSF system produced 2.05 Mg ha -1 yr -1 wheat equivalent yield (WEY), which was similar to the 1.96 Mg ha -1 yr -1 WEY from the WWSF rotation and greater than WW, which produced 1.53 Mg ha -1 yr -1 of wheat grain. A WSF rotation would have produced 2.0 Mg ha -1 yr -1 WEY, so the 4-yr rotations were not more productive than a 3-yr WSF rotation.