2017
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n2p671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic characterization and responses to coffeeleaf rust in coffee progenies resistant to the gall nematode Meloidogyne exigua

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine agronomic characteristics and responses to the coffee leaf rust fungus (Hemileia vastatrix Berk. et Br.) in coffee progenies resistant to the gall nematode Meloidogyne exigua. The experiment was conducted in December 2000 at Ouro Verde Farm (FazendaOuro Verde), located in the municipality of Campos Altos -Minas Gerais (MG). Ten F 3:4 progenies were evaluated. They were derived from crosses between CIFC 2570 Timor Hybrid selections and Catuaí cultivars known to be resistan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, resistance to coffee leaf rust disease controlled by nine major dominant genes (Silva et al, 2006) or at least one gene with two alleles (Diola et al, 2011), which makes selection needs to be conducted several times. Variations in Arabica coffee genotypes support the coffee breeders in obtaining genotypes that are resistant to coffee leaf rust disease (Caicedo, Guerrero, Roux, & Wingfield, 2013;Harni et al, 2015;Hindorf & Omondi, 2011;Hulupi et al, 2013;Ibrahim et al, 2016;Rezende et al, 2017;Sugiarti, 2017). In addition, coffee plant with high resistance to coffee leaf rust disease presumably has high production (Costa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, resistance to coffee leaf rust disease controlled by nine major dominant genes (Silva et al, 2006) or at least one gene with two alleles (Diola et al, 2011), which makes selection needs to be conducted several times. Variations in Arabica coffee genotypes support the coffee breeders in obtaining genotypes that are resistant to coffee leaf rust disease (Caicedo, Guerrero, Roux, & Wingfield, 2013;Harni et al, 2015;Hindorf & Omondi, 2011;Hulupi et al, 2013;Ibrahim et al, 2016;Rezende et al, 2017;Sugiarti, 2017). In addition, coffee plant with high resistance to coffee leaf rust disease presumably has high production (Costa et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Plants were scored according to a ten point arbitrary scale in which score 1 corresponds to plants with the poorest vegetative vigor and marked depletion symptoms. The score 10 indicates plants with excellent vigor, more leafy and with marked vegetative growth of the productive branches 51 , 52 . Productivity is measured by weighing the fruit immediately after harvest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of coffee leaf rust resistance of the nonspecific or polygenic type, it is desirable because it is durable, while the specific resistance can be broken by new genotypes of the pathogen (COSTA et al, 2013). Most of the hybrids studied presented low RI and RS, a fact that is desired by researchers because they are sources of durable and efficient resistance against multiple races of a specific pathogen (REZENDE et al, 2017), not hiding the expression of horizontal resistance (BOTELHO et al al., 2010).…”
Section: Coffee Science Lavrasmentioning
confidence: 99%