AHP-Ideal Point Model for Large Underground Petroleum Storage Site Selection: An Engineering Application

Li, Zhiqiang; Xue, Yiguo; Qiu, Daohong; Xu, Zhenhao; Zhang, Xueliang; Zhou, Binghua; Wang, Xintong

doi:10.3390/su9122343

Cited by 20 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their information is collected through field investigation and collection of government documents. [68], this paper employs Shannon information entropy to determine the weight value of each public facility (See Table A1). Since TOPSIS is a widely used quantifying method characterized by low data requirement, simple calculation processing, and ease of operation, it is chosen to measure the location value of urban regeneration projects by utilizing the weight value above mentioned.…”

Section: Information Of Urban Regeneration Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Positive or Negative: The Heterogeneities in the Effects of Urban Regeneration on Surrounding Economic Vitality—From the Perspective of Housing Price

Yuan,

2024

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urban regeneration is a sound, sustainable urban development strategy globally. In China, promoting urban regeneration has become the national sustainable urban strategy. Under the resource constraint, it is necessary to understand what benefits different types of urban regeneration projects can contribute to urban development. Much research has contributed to evaluating the benefits of urban regeneration on the project scale. The systematic investigation of their effects on surrounding economic vitality, especially the comparison between different types of projects, is relatively downplayed. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the effects of urban regeneration projects on surrounding economic vitality by calculating the change in housing prices. Chongqing is selected as the case city. Based on the housing transaction data from 2015 to 2021, a staggered difference-in-difference method is employed to capture the results. The finding shows that the overall effects are significantly negative, especially within a 400–800 m radius. Higher investment or better project location relates to stronger negative effects. Moreover, the differences in effects among the three types of urban regeneration projects are clearly revealed from diverse perspectives. It provides a valuable reference for policymakers and urban planners to make urban regeneration planning better by considering comprehensive benefits.

show abstract

Section: Information Of Urban Regeneration Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Positive or Negative: The Heterogeneities in the Effects of Urban Regeneration on Surrounding Economic Vitality—From the Perspective of Housing Price

Yuan,

2024

Land

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The AHP method enables us to systematize, hierarchize and quantify the existing intricate problems, thereby determining the importance of the factors that affect the target object. In the present study, the AHP method is adopted to obtain the subjective weights of the relevant evaluation factors (Li et al 2017;Tudes and Yigiter 2010). The general steps of the AHP are as follows:…”

Section: Determination Of Subjective Weightmentioning

confidence: 99%

A novel comprehensive quantitative method for various geological disaster evaluations in underground engineering: multidimensional finite interval cloud model (MFICM)

Gao

Zhou

et al. 2021

Environ Earth Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The risk prediction of geological disasters exhibits extreme uncertainty and complexity due to the random distribution of evaluation indexes within a finite interval. To improve the accuracy of disaster prediction results, a new evaluation method is in this study suggested to perform a risk evaluation of geological disasters based on multidimensional finite interval cloud model (MFICM) and combination weighting. The MFICM with a transformation between qualitative concept and quantitative data depicts uncertainties and actual distribution features of indexes in the finite 2 interval. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA) are adopted to determine the subjective and objective weights of evaluation indexes, respectively, and the combination weight is calculated by a linear method to reduce the influence of subjective factors.The numerical characteristic parameters of each indexes belonging to various risk levels are first calculated based on established evaluation index system. Subsequently, a multi-dimensional finite interval cloud is generated from a forward cloud generator using MATLAB software. Finally, the comprehensive certainty degrees relative to different levels for each sample are determined combined with combination weight, which achieves a mapping of uncertainty between semantic variables and index values. The proposed method is applied to engineering cases regarding three geological disasters, i.e., water inrush, rock burst and collapse. The obtained results with accuracy and results comparison with reference methods show that the MFICM is verified to be practical and universal for the risk evaluation of geological disasters, which improves and enriches the theoretical framework of geotechnical engineering disaster risk evaluation.

show abstract

“…In our case we selected the six different forest sites or alternatives (N = 6) considered in the preference identification module in the SILVANET computer program. A method of similarity to an ideal point [47,48] was used to identify the alternatives. The ideal point (IP) was defined by Martin-Fernández and Martinez-Falero, 2018 [44] as "the theoretical point where the sustainability indicators would have the highest possible value of 100".…”

Section: Identifying the Alternativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of AHP and a Utility-Based Theory Method for Selected Vertical and Horizontal Forest Structure Indicators in the Sustainability Assessment of Forest Management in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, Madrid Region

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper compares two pairwise comparison methods, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and a utility theory based method (UTB method), for sustainability assessment in forest management at the local level. Six alternatives were ranked, corresponding to six different types of forest management in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park in the Madrid Region in Spain. The methods were tested by postgraduate students enrolled in a “Decision Support Systems” course at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Three sustainability indicators were considered: structural diversity, timber yield, and amount of biomass. The utility theory based method was the first to be compared, which is implemented in the computer program SILVANET. For each pair of alternatives, the students were asked which one they considered to be more sustainable. In the case of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, the students compared the indicators and the alternatives for each indicator. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient indicated that there was no correlation between the rankings for most of the students. The results revealed that the convergence in opinion in the AHP method was higher than in the utility based method for a low number of participants, and distinguished the differences between the alternatives more accurately. However in the case of the UTB method, the participants considered sustainability as a whole and made a more context-based comparison.

show abstract

AHP-Ideal Point Model for Large Underground Petroleum Storage Site Selection: An Engineering Application

Cited by 20 publications

References 15 publications

Positive or Negative: The Heterogeneities in the Effects of Urban Regeneration on Surrounding Economic Vitality—From the Perspective of Housing Price

Positive or Negative: The Heterogeneities in the Effects of Urban Regeneration on Surrounding Economic Vitality—From the Perspective of Housing Price

A novel comprehensive quantitative method for various geological disaster evaluations in underground engineering: multidimensional finite interval cloud model (MFICM)

Comparison of AHP and a Utility-Based Theory Method for Selected Vertical and Horizontal Forest Structure Indicators in the Sustainability Assessment of Forest Management in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, Madrid Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About