AI as a Methodology for Supporting Educational Praxis and Teacher Metacognition

Abstract

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is of critical importance in education where emphasis is placed on the need to equip educators with an ability to independently generate and reflect on evidence of their practices in situ -a process also known as praxis. This paper examines existing research related to teachers' metacognitive skills and, using two exemplar projects, it discusses the utility and relevance of AI methods of knowledge representation and knowledge elicitation as methodologies for supporting EBP. Research related to technology-enhanced communities of practice as a means for teachers to share and compare their knowledge with others is also examined. Suggestions for the key considerations in supporting teachers' metacognition in praxis are made based on the review of literature and discussion of the specific projects, with the aim to highlight potential future research directions for AIEd. A proposal is made that a crucial part of AIEd's future resides in its curating the role of AI as a methodology for supporting teacher training and continuous professional development, especially as relates to their developing metacognitive skills in relation to their practices.

Challenging the knowledge‐transfer orthodoxy: Knowledge co‐construction in technology‐enhanced learning for children with autism

“…This points to a methodological gap, insofar as there is a notable lack of common means of expression available through which a teacher may be able to communicate their experiences to others (other practitioners as well as researchers), without having to make a heroic effort to learn a means of expression that is entirely foreign to them (e.g. Lin et al ., ; Porayska‐Pomsta, ). Thus, a willingness to participate, along with the democratic approach to evidence generation and sharing, may be hindered by a lack of confidence in exploring new ideas , coupled with a lack of common tools for capturing, expressing and interpreting knowledge.…”

Blending Human and Artificial Intelligence to Support Autistic Children’s Social Communication Skills

“…The idiosyncratic nature of autism adds to the challenge of reconciling the need to understand the individual child in the context of specific environments and situations, and the desire to generalise the intervention approaches used along with any evidence of their success. On the whole, 'hard' evidence, i.e., that which is typically generated through randomised control trials, seldom infiltrates real classroom practice, not least because interventions that are tightly controlled in the clinical or lab environments are notoriously hard to replicate by clinically untrained front-line practitioners in often messy and only partly predictable classroom settings (Dingfelder and Mandell 2011;Parsons et al 2013;Porayska-Pomsta 2016).…”

Adolescents’ Self-regulation During Job Interviews Through an AI Coaching Environment

“…1, right) to facilitate discussion and reflection. The pedagogical set up of TARDIS was designed through a series of studies with learners and practitioners to complement the existing real-world practices used in youth organisations and job centres, and to leverage in a blended way the strengths of both TARDIS and of human practitioners [7].…”