AI-Based Decisiona and Disappearance of Law

Razmetaeva, Yulia; Satokhina, Natalia

doi:10.5817/mujlt2022-2-5

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Artificial intelligence is to be considered as a service with legal responsibilities, liabilities, and policy challenges (Cobbe, 2021). However, AI-based decisions could lead even to disappearance of law (Razmetaeva & Satokhina, 2022).…”

Section: Supranational and National Dimensions Of Prejudicementioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Supranational and National Dimensions Of Prejudicementioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2023

Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Balancing the scale: navigating ethical and practical challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in legal practices

Zafar

2024

Discov Artif Intell

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper explores the integration of artificial intelligence in legal practice, discussing the ethical and practical issues that arise and how it affects customary legal procedures. It emphasises the shift from labour-intensive legal practice to technology-enhanced methods, with a focus on artificial intelligence's potential to improve access to legal services and streamline legal procedures. This discussion importantly highlights the ethical challenges introduced by the integration of Artificial Intelligence, with a specific focus on issues of bias and transparency. These ethical concerns become particularly paramount in the context of sensitive legal areas, including but not limited to, child custody disputes, criminal justice, and divorce settlements. It underscores the critical need for maintaining ethical vigilance, advocating for developing and implementing AI systems characterised by a profound commitment to ethical integrity. This approach is vital to guarantee fairness and uphold transparency across all judicial proceedings. The study advocates for a "human in the loop" strategy that combines human knowledge and AI techniques to mitigate biases and guarantee individualised legal results to ensure AI functions as a complement rather than a replacement, the paper concludes by emphasising the necessity of preserving the human element in legal practices.

show abstract

Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions

Barikova¹

2023

Ûridičnij Časopis Nacìonalʹnoï Akademìï Vnutrìšnìh Sprav

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The imperfection of the procedure for implementing prejudgment in court proceedings may lead to instability of practice, and this demonstrates the relevance of the research topic with regard to formulating clear criteria for the mechanism of discretionary prejudgment in the application of financial rules of law. With this in mind, the purpose of the article is to identify the peculiarities of bias of discretionary powers in the law enforcement of financial rules of law. The methodological tools are based on the general philosophical (dialectical, hermeneutical), general scientific formal (empirical in the form of observation, description and comparison; axiomatic; hypothetical-deductive; formalization; unity of historical and logical) and special scientific methods (formal-logical; comparative legal; systemic and structural), as well as the methodology of reversal and monitoring of a preliminary court decision, which allows to study theoretical and practical issues of discretionary powers in the law enforcement of financial and legal provisions in the unity of their substantive component and external form of reflection. The author proposes a classification of prejudice by: the level of law enforcement; legal force of prejudice; significance of the established factual circumstances which are the subject of proof; nature of the accusation; and subject. The author examines the psychological dimension of the use of prejudicial categories as a metacognitive activity of establishing and taking into account the meaning of prejudice, taking into account the accuracy of empirical generalizations, and formulating judgments to identify the future consequences of making decisions with prejudicial categories contained in the original decision. The author outlines the mechanism for implementing the legal policy on the use of financial prejudicial categories, which should be based primarily on the instrumental and procedural characteristics of this model of legal influence. It is established that in the organizational and legal aspect, the conditions for the national market segment to enter the cross-border space are formed by streamlining the procedures for interaction of legal entities through the appropriate forms of legal influence. The practical significance of the results obtained is that they can be used to determine the procedure for applying prejudgment at the supranational and national levels, in particular, in the context of applying the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

show abstract

AI-Based Decisiona and Disappearance of Law

Cited by 3 publications

References 33 publications

Untitled

Untitled

Balancing the scale: navigating ethical and practical challenges of artificial intelligence (AI) integration in legal practices

Prejudice on discretion in law enforcement of financial legal provisions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About