2020
DOI: 10.1109/tiv.2020.2980758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI-IMU Dead-Reckoning

Abstract: In this paper we propose a novel accurate method for dead-reckoning of wheeled vehicles based only on an Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU). In the context of intelligent vehicles, robust and accurate dead-reckoning based on the IMU may prove useful to correlate feeds from imaging sensors, to safely navigate through obstructions, or for safe emergency stops in the extreme case of exteroceptive sensors failure. The key components of the method are the Kalman filter and the use of deep neural networks to dynamicall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
109
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
109
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the loss function is on the accuracy of the filter outputs, the noise parameters are trained to produce the best state estimate, and do not necessarily best capture the measurement error model. AI-IMU [16] uses this approach to estimate IMU noise parameters and measurement uncertainties for car applications. In this work, we also combine deep learning with a Kalman filter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the loss function is on the accuracy of the filter outputs, the noise parameters are trained to produce the best state estimate, and do not necessarily best capture the measurement error model. AI-IMU [16] uses this approach to estimate IMU noise parameters and measurement uncertainties for car applications. In this work, we also combine deep learning with a Kalman filter.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of unpredictable nonuniform noise as well as external environmental conditions is also inevitable [35]. To enhance the accuracy of localization, the solutions found in the literature can be classified into: (1) controlling the environment under investigation [36], (2) sensor data fusion [37], [38], (3) improving measurement covariane estimation [39], [30], [35], [40], or (4) correcting measurement errors, which can be further classified into classical [41], [42], [43], [44] and learning approaches [16], [45], [34], [46], [17], [47].…”
Section: Enhancing Slam Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More particularly, the approach targets unmodeled, unpredictable noise patterns that are experienced in marine environments. A recent noise model learning approach was proposed in [40] where a deep neural network was trained to estimate the covariance of inertial measurements, which are then used in an extended Kalman filter to perform localization. Evaluation results demonstrated the applicability of the approach, yet in its current version, it works for inertial sensors only.…”
Section: Enhancing Slam Estimation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major downside of this approach is that the accuracy of these models is highly dependent on the data used to train them. Proponents of the psuedo-measurement approach argue that the best way to incorporate learned models is by adding them as additional measurements to an existing navigation system (e.g., a Kalman filter) [38,49,52,53,55,58]. The benefit of this approach is that the existing navigation system is augmented rather than replaced; however, the challenge of this approach comes from determining the details of how the learned model(s) will be integrated into the existing system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%