2021
DOI: 10.4000/ctd.4775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AI in Africa : Framing AI through an African Lens

Abstract: Development and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in Africa has occurred slowly relative to developed countries. A vibrant AI ecosystem is growing on the continent. Due to the unique geographical, cultural and political nature of the continent, the 4th industrial revolution on the continent is evolving differently from its global counterparts. The motivations for development of AI systems, the parties involved, and the impact of the AI ecosystem on the continent are therefore best analyzed and framed th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In seeking to frame AI governance through an African lens, Wairegi et al (2021), suggest that stakeholders may be understood through the different normative claims they make with respect to the technology's implementation. These claims are centred on three basic stakes: economic opportunity, political equality, and authenticity.…”
Section: Governance Stakeholders and Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In seeking to frame AI governance through an African lens, Wairegi et al (2021), suggest that stakeholders may be understood through the different normative claims they make with respect to the technology's implementation. These claims are centred on three basic stakes: economic opportunity, political equality, and authenticity.…”
Section: Governance Stakeholders and Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is premised on how the African perspective on AI design and deployment is largely missing within global AI discourse. Even with the expansion of commentaries (Cisse, 2018;Hao, 2019;Birhane, 2020;Siyonbola, 2021;Allison, 2023), articles (Wairegi, Omino & Rutenberg, 2021;Birhane et al, 2022;Eke & Ogoh, 2022) and edited books (Brokensha, Kotzé & Senekal, 2023;Eke, Wakunuma & Akintoye, 2023) on AI in/from Africa, "Africa's diverse philosophical, religious, political, historical and linguistic traditions that can capture alternative narratives of what AI can and should be are almost forgotten" (Eke & Ogoh, 2022 p. 2). This has begun to change with actors across sectors and the domestication of African perspectives and experiences within the global AI narratives (e.g.…”
Section: Adopting Ai In the Global South -Social And Political Implic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This form of support could involve designing AI that can contribute to the expansion and enhancement of the agricultural and livestock activities of the community, growing the knowledge base of the members of the community through informal and formal education, etc. This view is justified by the results of recent studies which aimed to critically analyse the developing AI ecosystems from an African perspective (Wairegi, Omino & Rutenberg, 2021), and how they could support the design and adoption of AI amongst indigenous and marginalised communities. The authors created an AI stakeholder framework which according to their research is one of the crucial first steps in this process (Wairegi, Omino & Rutenberg, 2021).…”
Section: Communality and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work of this special issue highlights the ethical and socio-political implications for composing with and for imagined and unimaginable audiences (De Kosnik, 2021; Dixon-Román et al , 2020). As Enriquez et al (this issue) emphasize, this is a moment requiring both recognition of the pasts and presents of algorithms in contemporary society–particularly in relation to how we create, compose, and interpret meaning – and a reimagining of what it means to reconfigure compositional technologies and lived, embodied enactments (Watson and Marciano, 2023) toward more just futures (Pangrazio et al , 2022; Wairegi et al , 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%