The Evidence and Impact of Financial Globalization 2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397874-5.00031-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aid Flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This development reflected mainly the reduction of the external debt granted to Rwanda by the international community through the HIPC and MDRI debt relief initiatives. Indeed, the total external debt relief provided to Rwanda under the two initiatives amounted to US$ 1.4 billion for HIPC in 2005 and US$516 million for MDRI in 2006 (Cassimon, Essers and Verbeke, 2016) and reduced the relative weight of the external public debt from 79% to 15% of GDP between 2004 and 2006; as a consequence, the total public debt of Rwanda also declined from 91% to 24% of GDP in the same period.…”
Section: Rwanda's Public Debt Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This development reflected mainly the reduction of the external debt granted to Rwanda by the international community through the HIPC and MDRI debt relief initiatives. Indeed, the total external debt relief provided to Rwanda under the two initiatives amounted to US$ 1.4 billion for HIPC in 2005 and US$516 million for MDRI in 2006 (Cassimon, Essers and Verbeke, 2016) and reduced the relative weight of the external public debt from 79% to 15% of GDP between 2004 and 2006; as a consequence, the total public debt of Rwanda also declined from 91% to 24% of GDP in the same period.…”
Section: Rwanda's Public Debt Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, there are several channels that aid can either foster or hinder FDI inflows (Asiedu et al, 2009;Cassimon et al, 2013;Donaubauer et al, 2016;Garriga & Phillips, 2014;Harms & Lutz, 2006;Kimura & Todo, 2010;Selaya & Sunesen, 2012). On the positive effects of aid, foreign aid makes the recipient country more attractive to FDI when: (1) it increases the stock of economic and social infrastructures through its public infrastructure financing leading to a further increase in the marginal product of private capital (MPK), the so-called infrastructure effects; (2) it improves recipient country's ability to finance the sustained outflows of profit repatriations from FDI;…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, foreign aid also can substitute or crowd out private foreign capital flows. First, foreign aid can foster rent-seeking activities by incentivising private (and public) agents to compete for rents from inflows of aid hence displacing talents and efforts from productive activities, e.g., R&D and training (Cassimon et al, 2013). Consequently, this aid induced unproductive rent-seeking makes the aid recipient country less attractive to the FDI inflow (Harms & Lutz, 2006).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation