Aid for AIDS in Africa

Gaibulloev, Khusrav; Sandler, Todd

doi:10.1007/s00181-011-0527-3

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Placebo Tests1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2013

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent4

Authors

Journals

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is a theoretical rationale for these empirical results. While donor countries tend to give aid to combat HIV/AIDS to those states that are most affected by the epidemic, there is also a substitution or free-riding dynamic in which other donors give less to a specific recipient state when one donor gives a larger amount (Gaibulloev and Sandler, 2012). This could also be due to explicit multilateral coordination among donors.…”

Section: Placebo Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Doing Well by Doing Good: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Foreign Public Opinion

Goldsmith

Horiuchi

Wood

2014

QJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Placebo Testsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Doing Well by Doing Good: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Foreign Public Opinion

Goldsmith

Horiuchi

Wood

2014

QJPS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

What goes wrong with the allocation of domestic and international resources for HIV?

Sterck

2017

Health Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper examines how domestic and international financing for HIV is, and ought to be, distributed. We build a theoretical framework that decomposes domestic and international financing for HIV into nonlinear functions of national income, HIV prevalence, and government effectiveness. We test this model, paying particular attention to nonlinearities and to problems of bad controls, multicollinearity, and reverse causality. Finally, we use the fitted values of quartile regressions to study how much countries could reasonably pay domestically and how much they should receive from donors. Worryingly, countries with higher financial means receive on average more aid per PLHIV than very poor ones, and countries with higher HIV prevalence receive on average less aid per people living with HIV. The normative analysis concludes that US$3.08 billion of fiscal space could be created in LIC and MIC. We identify the countries that could be allocated more aid.

show abstract

Untying the motives of giving grants vs. loans

Gaibulloev

Younas

2018

European Journal of Political Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aid for AIDS in Africa

Cited by 4 publications

References 33 publications

Doing Well by Doing Good: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Foreign Public Opinion

Doing Well by Doing Good: The Impact of Foreign Aid on Foreign Public Opinion

What goes wrong with the allocation of domestic and international resources for HIV?

Untying the motives of giving grants vs. loans

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About