1960
DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1960.10489880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aids for Fitting the Gamma Distribution by Maximum Likelihood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is expected as Geng et al (1986) based their linear model for b on estimates using the ML approximation method of Greenwood and Durand (1960). This also agrees with the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…This is expected as Geng et al (1986) based their linear model for b on estimates using the ML approximation method of Greenwood and Durand (1960). This also agrees with the literature (e.g.…”
Section: Parameter Estimatessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For a fixed mean precipitation, the growing scale parameter implies increasing of the percentile for a relatively large (more than 10 mm/day) precipitation value. Quantitative estimation of the shape and scale parameters was performed using maximum likelihood method of Greenwood and Durand (1960), based on ln(hxi)Àhln(x)i, hi being the averaging operator, which is more effective than the traditional moment estimators (Wilks, 1990(Wilks, , 1995 and more accurate for the data used than the Thom (1958) method. From the Gamma distribution, we have derived the other statistical characteristics of daily precipitation, such as different percentiles and others.…”
Section: Strategy and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as a function of In (g/x), and Wilk, Gnanadesikan, and Huyett (1962) give tables of I? as a function of Q = [l -(a/2)-l]-l. Greenwood and Durand (1960) also provide rational approximations for I?.…”
Section: Tests or Confidence Limits For Pmentioning
confidence: 98%