2015
DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1077196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aiming for autonomy: formative peer assessment in a final-year undergraduate course

Abstract: This article takes a dual focus on the theme of student formative peer assessment. On the one hand it offers a thorough literature review in this field, while on the other it unpacks a case study of curriculum design where peer assessment has been adopted. The practical example draws on recent changes made to a third-and final-year undergraduate research dissertation course in a UK architectural school. Although peer assessment worked quite well in this small setting, similar findings might be uncovered when s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An assessment culture is, on the other hand, characterized by what Meer and Chapman (2015) describe as learning-oriented assessment, where focus is on the learning elements of assessment assisting students to become reflective practitioners, and to develop higher order cognitive skills. Here focus is on the formative aspects of assessment, as formative techniques are expected to support student motivation and achievement (Nolan 2011;Wiliam 2011;Carnell 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An assessment culture is, on the other hand, characterized by what Meer and Chapman (2015) describe as learning-oriented assessment, where focus is on the learning elements of assessment assisting students to become reflective practitioners, and to develop higher order cognitive skills. Here focus is on the formative aspects of assessment, as formative techniques are expected to support student motivation and achievement (Nolan 2011;Wiliam 2011;Carnell 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutual learning and peer assessment are two very important and positive teaching methods in design education (Carnell, 2015;Tucker & Abbasi, 2015). The use of these two methods in architectural design education is expected to also help students achieve better learning results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model suggests that learners should firstly become comfortable engaging in selfassessment tasks, which should incorporate a form of feedback from a more competent other in other to validate their judgment of their own performance against given criteria. Mindful of the potential of self-assessment as a useful first step to support peer assessment (Carnell, 2016), the model proposes a movement towards combining self-assessment and peerassessment to allow the learner to understand how a peer may perceive elements of assessment and feedback differently. Following this, group-to group peer assessment and feedback is encouraged, as this can enhance confidence in judgement and communication of feedback, supported by the relative "safety" or anonymity of making and communicating group judgments.…”
Section: Theory: Using Self-and Peer-assessment To Develop Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%