2015
DOI: 10.1017/s1755773915000260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aiming higher: the consequences of progressive ambition among MPs in European parliaments

Abstract: How ambitious are MPs in European parliaments and how does progressive ambition affect their strategies? We argue that progressively ambitious members of parliament try to generate individual visibility and seek the support of party leaders who decide on promotion while at the same time ensuring reelection by adjusting to electoral system incentives. Using novel data from a 15-country MP survey we show that progressive ambition is widespread in Europe and Israel. As hypothesized, progressively ambitious MPs ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This operationalization ignores those MPs who did not stand and those who ascended to higher positions due to party internal quota or similar rules; moreover, the data are extremely difficult to obtain for all relevant positions in committees, parties, and parliament. The most appropriate measure for different ambition levels would include a direct measure of a parliamentarian's desire to stay in office, which is best attained with a direct survey question about his or her future career prospects (for examples, see Herrick and Moore ; Høyland, Hobolt, and Hix ; Maestas ; Sieberer and Müller ). However, this approach suffers from the same problem as most surveys: low response rates and, most likely, selection bias; moreover, it measures ambition only at one point in time of a career.…”
Section: Career Prospect and Expertise Impacting Legislative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This operationalization ignores those MPs who did not stand and those who ascended to higher positions due to party internal quota or similar rules; moreover, the data are extremely difficult to obtain for all relevant positions in committees, parties, and parliament. The most appropriate measure for different ambition levels would include a direct measure of a parliamentarian's desire to stay in office, which is best attained with a direct survey question about his or her future career prospects (for examples, see Herrick and Moore ; Høyland, Hobolt, and Hix ; Maestas ; Sieberer and Müller ). However, this approach suffers from the same problem as most surveys: low response rates and, most likely, selection bias; moreover, it measures ambition only at one point in time of a career.…”
Section: Career Prospect and Expertise Impacting Legislative Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because career politicians are so driven by ambition, they concentrate on the game of politics (Wright, 2013, p. 449;Sieberer and Müller, 2017). They want to make a mark to advance their careers.…”
Section: Ambitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For excessive ambition, responses to the second question are instructive: those who believe their chances of achieving further positions are very good or even fairly good (18%) will, according to Schlesinger's (1966) ambition theory, be more determined than those who want further positions but see their chances as uncertain, very small or negligible (33%) (see also Sieberer and Müller, 2017). At the very least, responses to this second question help weed out those who are less serious about promotion.…”
Section: Likelihood Of Achieving Further Positionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also enjoy a large electoral advantage, as documented in Canada (Kendall and Rekkas, 2012), Spain (Llaudet, 2014), or Norway (Fiva et al, 2019;Fiva and Smith, 2018). Interestingly, the European Parliament-farther away from home, far less prestigious, and less influential in policy-making-constitutes an exception to this pattern (Meserve et al, 2009;Sieberer and Müller, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%