2013
DOI: 10.12816/0011932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ain Shams University Residents' Knowledge , Attitudes , and Barriers to Practice Evidence Based Medicine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly similar results were obtained by Hassan et al (2014) in which 10% of participants attended critical appraisal courses (7). Our results were higher than that reported by Boulus et al (2013) in which only 4% attended critical appraisal courses (6). A relatively higher percentage was obtained by Ismail et al (2011) at 19.1% attending such courses (17).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Nearly similar results were obtained by Hassan et al (2014) in which 10% of participants attended critical appraisal courses (7). Our results were higher than that reported by Boulus et al (2013) in which only 4% attended critical appraisal courses (6). A relatively higher percentage was obtained by Ismail et al (2011) at 19.1% attending such courses (17).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…This study indicated a generally positive attitude towards the current promotion of EBM. Boulus et al 2013found that 77.8% of participants had a positive attitude toward EBM (6). This was also similar to that reported by Abeysene et al (2012) in which 75.8% of the study participants had a positive attitude towards the current promotion of EBM (13), while studies by Barghouti et al (2009) indicated that 63.5% of participants were positive towards EBM (14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All 56 articles were observational studies. Eleven studies were conducted in Europe, three studies in North America, two studies in Australia, six studies in North Africa, 26 studies in South‐West Asia, and five studies in East‐Asia . Twenty‐two studies included primary care physicians, 15 studies included residents, 15 studies included specialists and subspecialists, and nine studies had a mixed sample of physicians including GPs, residents, specialists, and subspecialists, while in seven studied type of physicians was not specified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%