“…The photocurrent response of 1 reaches ∼1.62 μA/cm 2 , which is slightly smaller than that of Zn 4 B 6 O 12 S (∼2.1 μA/cm 2 ) but larger than that of most known oxychalcogenides or chalcogenides, for example, [(Ba 19 C l4 )(Ga 6 Si 12 O 42 S 8 )] (∼0.5 μA/cm 2 ), Eu 8 In 17.33 S 34 (∼1.0 μA/cm 2 ), and Tm 4 S 4 Te 3 (∼1.1 μA/cm 2 ) . Sample 2 exhibits a relatively weak photocurrent response with 0.12 μA/cm 2 , and the value is also larger than that of some chalcogenides or chalcohalides, for example, BaCuSbS 3 (∼0.055 μA/cm 2 ), RbIn 4 S 6 Cl (∼0.029 μA/cm 2 ), and Pb 5 Sn 3 S 10 Cl 2 (∼0.019 μA/cm 2 ) . Although isostructural 1 and 2 possess similar DOSs, they exhibit distinct different photocurrent signals that perhaps are induced by their difference in optical band gaps and the radiation intensity’s change of the light source at diverse wavelengths.…”