SAE Technical Paper Series 1996
DOI: 10.4271/962438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air Bags and Children: Results of a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Special Investigation into Actual Crashes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[81][82][83][84][85] Several researchers reviewed case series of children exposed to deploying passenger air bags to elucidate the mechanisms of injury. [86][87][88][89][90] For children killed in a rear-facing CSSs, the air bag typically deployed into the rear surface of the child restraint near the child's head and caused fatal skull and brain injuries. For older children who were either unrestrained or restrained in seat belts inappropriate for their age, braking before impact caused the child to pitch forward so that they were in the path of the air bag as it deployed.…”
Section: Children and Air Bagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[81][82][83][84][85] Several researchers reviewed case series of children exposed to deploying passenger air bags to elucidate the mechanisms of injury. [86][87][88][89][90] For children killed in a rear-facing CSSs, the air bag typically deployed into the rear surface of the child restraint near the child's head and caused fatal skull and brain injuries. For older children who were either unrestrained or restrained in seat belts inappropriate for their age, braking before impact caused the child to pitch forward so that they were in the path of the air bag as it deployed.…”
Section: Children and Air Bagsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, preimpact braking was included in the simulation because braking has been shown to be a common characteristic of air bag crashes with occupant fatalities. 8 The rate of braking was simulated at 6.8 m/s 2 , previously shown to be characteristic of average driver behavior. 9 For all simulations, the vehicle seat was set at the rearmost position.…”
Section: Computer Crash Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For unrestrained children, our simulations predicted occupant movement and resultant injuries that agreed with investigations of child fatalities due to air bags. 8,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] Our model predicted serious head, neck, and chest injuries. The reported injuries sustained by children as a result of air bag exposure included head injuries (extracranial hemorrhage, parenchymal brain injury, cerebral edema, brain swelling, intracranial hemorrhage, brain herniation, and skull fracture), neck injuries (cervical cord injury, cervical spine dislocation, subluxation, and frac-ture), and thoracic injuries (interatrial septum hematoma, pulmonary hemorrhage, pulmonary contusions, inferior vena cava laceration, and sternal fracture).…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include altering the language in which an intervention is delivered6 to a population or varying the implementation of an intervention to accommodate important individual differences, for example, through kiosk-delivered tailored messaging7 8 or safety technology tailored to the characteristics of the vehicle occupant. When air bags were first introduced, they were largely one-size-fits-all and children and short-statured women suffered fatal injuries when in the path of the deploying air bag 9. Over the past few decades, manufacturers of vehicles, restraints and air bags have increasingly added sophisticated sensors that recognise the presence of small-statured occupants who are seated close to the air bag, putting them at risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%