Air-coupled and ground-coupled ground penetrating radar techniques

Vilbig, Reid

doi:10.17760/d20003382

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The maximum antenna offset for air coupling is less than a meter [12]. The main advantages of the air coupled is the data can be collected at a high speed without damaging the antenna [13]. However, the air coupled's capabilities are limited by the depth of penetration, where it can only cover a shallow area.…”

Section: Air Coupled Antennamentioning

confidence: 99%

Utilizing of 500 MHz Ground Penetrating Radar Antenna Coupling at Different Interval Heights Clearance

Junoh,

Sulaiman,

Razali

et al. 2023

IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding the characteristics of the GPR antenna for underground utility detection purposes is critical to ensuring that buried pipes and cables can be accurately located. Considering the ground coupling antenna is the most effective way to carry out the GPR scan, most of the operators applied this setup to ensure the maximum amount of the electromagnetic wave could be penetrated into the ground. However, the contact between the GPR and the ground surface causes the bottom of the antenna enclosure to become scratched and worn out. Due to the cost and time involved in transportation to replace the antenna protector, a few GPR operators changed the protector to the cheapest one, which affects the characteristics of the antenna and could alter the depth of the underground utilities. A 500 MHz GPR antenna are tested to identify the optimum antenna coupling based on the accuracy assessment at various interval clearance heights in order to reduce damage and preserve the antenna. An experiment was carried out at Department of Survey and Mapping Malaysia (JUPEM) Kuala Lumpur’s Underground Utility Test Base. Based on the result of the signal strength, the higher the antenna is lifted, the higher the rate of the signal becomes weak or lost. For the depth accuracy test, the high differences in depth when the antenna is lifted up at 4cm to 6cm based on the result of comparison with the standard values provided by the JUPEM. On the other hand, the accuracy of each antenna height is compared and validated based on the Residual Mean Square Error (RMSE). Overall, this study could lead to the conclusion that the result of the assessment is within the acceptable RMSE tolerance, which is below 0.1m. The objective of the research is successfully achieved when the antenna at a 3cm to 6cm interval height setup provides the best clearance based on the criteria of signal strength, depth comparison, and accuracy assessment. Finally, the issue of contact between the antenna and the ground surface, which causes the antenna to become scratched and worn out, could be reduced and preserved as a result of the findings.

show abstract

Section: Air Coupled Antennamentioning

confidence: 99%