1986
DOI: 10.1016/0379-7112(86)90030-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air entrainment into smoke and hot gases in open shafts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1/5 scale vertical shaft model which was first chosen to research about the smoke in vertical shaft by Marshall [23] A geometrically simplified model (2D) is illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: A Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1/5 scale vertical shaft model which was first chosen to research about the smoke in vertical shaft by Marshall [23] A geometrically simplified model (2D) is illustrated in Fig. 1.…”
Section: A Physical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to expand the capabilities of existing models of smoke movement in vertical shafts, Marshall performed experiments in a 1/5 th scale model of a 5 story open shaft [39]. With heat input at the bottom, it was found that the gases clung to the walls as they flowed up the shaft.…”
Section: Tests Conducted Without Sprinkler Protectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diameter of an axisymmetric plume is approximately half the height above the origin as shown in figure 3 (D = 0.5z, where D is diameter, and z is height above origin). Marshall (1986) showed that a doorjet in a shaft is approximated by half of an axisymmetric plume which is referred to as a wall plume (figure 6). The cross section of a wall plume is a semi-circle, and its mass flow is about half that of an axisymmetric plume.…”
Section: Applicability Of Fwo Zone Model For Shaftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannon and Zukoski (1976) studied the instability and turbulent mixing of hot lower layer in a shaft only open at the bottom. Marshall (1985 and1986) Air movement due to normal and reverse stack effect…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%