2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air pollution and metabolic disorders: Dynamic versus static measures of exposure among Hispanics/Latinos and non-Hispanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…indoor exposures, occupation-related exposures) or capture daily mobility. 45 Lastly, our exposure data were only available for 2000–2016. Annual exposure surfaces for 1997–1999 and 2017–2018 were produced by the temporal calibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…indoor exposures, occupation-related exposures) or capture daily mobility. 45 Lastly, our exposure data were only available for 2000–2016. Annual exposure surfaces for 1997–1999 and 2017–2018 were produced by the temporal calibration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dynamic exposure assessment took advantage of the spatiotemporal exposure measures obtained from GPS tracking and has the potential to contribute new insights into exposure-health associations. Finally, while many previous GPS-based studies had study domains limited to a single city [ 9 , 61 63 ], we tested our approach based on a nationwide sample from the Netherlands, providing data from diverse environmental settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we could not account for mobility (time-activity) patterns during pregnancy and childhood, which has the potential to introduce pollutant-specific exposure misclassification errors that could bias the associations. 45 Overall, these exposure errors are likely to be nondifferential, possibly contributing to the null association observed between UFPs and childhood asthma onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%