Physiology of Cotton 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-3195-2_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Air Pollution Stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 It is widely believed that despite being less abundant than O 3 , some secondary air pollutants may be more phytotoxic through the "mole for mole" actions. 2 Generally, PAN is generated in air polluted by fuel emissions or by biomass burning and is a possible indicator of photochemical smog. 3 Its production is initiated by the reaction of hydrocarbons with the hydroxyl radical (HO • ) and subsequently with O 2 to form the peroxyacetyl radical as specific intermediate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 It is widely believed that despite being less abundant than O 3 , some secondary air pollutants may be more phytotoxic through the "mole for mole" actions. 2 Generally, PAN is generated in air polluted by fuel emissions or by biomass burning and is a possible indicator of photochemical smog. 3 Its production is initiated by the reaction of hydrocarbons with the hydroxyl radical (HO • ) and subsequently with O 2 to form the peroxyacetyl radical as specific intermediate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate a perennial species of economic importance, Pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.; cv. S-6), that has been characterized with respect to responses to O 3 and water limitation separately (Grantz, 2016;Temple & Grantz, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general treatment of responses to air pollutants in cotton has been presented by Temple and Grantz (2010). Descriptions and color photographs of O 3 injury to many species can be found in Recognition of Air Pollution Injury to Vegetation: A Pictorial Atlas (Flagler, 1998).…”
Section: Why Ozone?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting proportionality between yield loss and ambient O 3 concentration strongly suggested causality. Early concerns that closed or open-top chambers could overestimate yield impacts of O 3 have proven unfounded (Temple, 1990a;Temple and Grantz, 2010;USEPA, 2013). In open-top chambers designed to minimize potential effects on plant growth and development caused by the closed chambers used previously (Temple et al, 1985), cotton yields in the San Joaquin Valley similarly were reduced by 15 to 20% relative to charcoal-filtered controls.…”
Section: Cotton Yield and Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%